• 87 Posts
  • 259 Comments
Joined 7 years ago
cake
Cake day: April 17th, 2019

help-circle

  • “The western world” in politics doesn’t usually refer to geography, but to the high income euro-amerikkkan countries who benefitted from hundreds of years of theft (much from the countries you mentioned), who based themselves on individualism, private property, and capitalism, and prided themselves on their opposition to the collectivist policies of eastern countries.

    This is why Cuba for example is not considered part of the western world, yet japan and south korea are.

    Marxists also generally use the term “global south” or “the periphery” to refer to lower-income / exploited via unequal exchange, even though there are some “middle” / lower income countries in the global north also. It gets confusing I know.



  • These are all incredibly weak justifications wrapped in legalese, that’s really just a thin posturing as to their position, which is white/western supremacy, and refusing to hold themselves accountable for hundreds of years of ongoing theft. The EU also refuses to vote for the condemnation of nazism using the same type of legalistic justifications.

    I don’t have time to go through each of their sentences, but someone easily could ala the style of Marx’s critique of the gotha programme, because there’s hidden meanings and psychology behind almost every sentence that requires a paragraph.


















  • So much coded language in here.

    libspeak converted
    “Bombs have yet to create enduring democracies” “The Iranians must accept our superior yanqui form of goverment where the rich control everything, and bombs aren’t the right way to accomplish that.”
    “The american people”, “american casualties” “The lives of US storm-troops are more important than the civilians of the Iran”
    “violence begets violence” “God forbid these Iranians defend themselves and start killing our imperial troops!”
    “This war is unlawful”, “Uphold our constitution” “The sacred slaveholder-written documents which founded the US empire must be preserved, and we should only make war if it passes through congress like Iraq”
    “aimless war” “I don’t understand the causes, history, or why the US benefits from exerting its power in the ME / persia, so it seems aimless to me”