No but JD Vance was visiting just a few hours earlier
Look at Samsung’s history. This is their MO, it’s how they became the Samsung we know today - straight up steal actual product designs, not just concepts, not just copy closely, a compete steal, and sell until arrested.
Search “samsung employees swallow evidence”
Fun times.
It’s just crazy though because the modern Republican Party has become fascist. The very enemy that used to unite us all towards a better good against such evil.
This guy calculates
That’s because half the population actually believes they’ll be as rich as those high tax brackets (which will never happen).
Dam, you both sound right. And that’s some sad shit to realize.
You are absolutely right. I’ve corrected the mistake.
JD Vance is a weird-ass, mother couch fuckin’ piece of shit
That’s actually a good question. Surely Mastodon and Lemmy instances should have also seen an uptick in registrations?
This is extremely dangerous to our democracy
Just out of curiosity, are you an Apple user, looking for alternatives to Apple’s AppStore?
WD, in turn, claimed the firm had not infringed Suess’ patents
So did they or didn’t they infringe? The article doesn’t say. I imagine MRT disassembled some drives to examine for infringement.
It is also possible that these hundreds of employees across the globe working R&D for Western Digital may have developed the same, or nearly the same, technology. But then MRT filed first if they were awarded the patient.
Given the track record of memory and other computer parts manufactures, I would say it’s more likely that they’re simply lying through their teeth.
That’s just pedophilia with extra steps
They’re not just sure, they’re Internet sure!
Ha! Now I see it - that was very funny, sir!
I see what you did there
This should be the new shittymorph gotcha
but don’t let that distract you from the fact that in nineteen ninety eight JD Vance asked Jeffrey Epstein, while visiting Epstein Island, how old the loveseat was.
Oh man, I totally understand the humor in that, lol! You should post what it means so that others in the thread will know like we both know!
Neither the MacTrast nor the original 9to5 article discusses the security behind Apple’s iOS implementation. But we know all firmware packages are signed and I would imagine this would be no different, with the recovery partition OS performing a check of the signature.