Around the same certainly that I think balloons exist inside giraffes on the moon of TRAPPIST-1b.

I mean we can talk about how god is a non sense idea.

It was actually December 12, 2000

The president should absolutely be concerned about doing something illegal and be afraid to act swiftly when that’s the case. If it’s the law then it needs to not be violated, that’s the point. If a law needs a provision for war time actions add one. Those exist this isn’t hard.

You can’t charge them for war crimes bc war crime isn’t a US law. This didn’t exist before and the official unofficial distinction was explicitly created in the ruling. The above post outlines exactly the process now established to block any case, suggesting that because a more ridiculously comically corrupt version of a ruling exist that this isn’t it nonsense and clearly demonstrative of your goal to spin propaganda.

Your post is a lie, self contradictory and explicit propaganda. Your account should be blocked and banned.

That’s true other than it’s absolutely not.

Yeah that religion is called science. To suggest that gaps exist on evolution so we need to go examine religion is an a joke of an argument. The difference in successful capturing of the reality of the process of life by the theory of evolution to any religion is galactic in scale. Your justification is ridiculous and only exists because you cannot let go of the lies someone taught you as a child in order to control you.

Unknowns just exists, religion assigns the unknown form. Why is that justified and even more incredible important to those who believe that it be true and to make choices due to the assignment of that form?

We did on Monday.

He literally is an old man. Which is the core issue.

Trump wouldn’t have agreed if the mods were going to been anything but prompt readers

The Dems are reactionaries and that is a terrible best option.

Look at the lib escalate into a spiraling web of complexity in order to justify failure. No, the timeline here was unreasonable and will allow trump to win again. The Dems have served up a silver platter to the wealthy.

I mean the reasons exist but if the system cannot rapidly respond to attempts to destroy it then those attempts will succeed.

That the charges weren’t made until late last year is also a failure, the whole process has been unreasonable long.

The system doesn’t want to save it’s self, we are on a clear path towards fascism.

Well that is disappointing.

Yes, the supreme Court gave itself that power. To that end the other branches could justifiably choose to not find that to be valid.

By Jan 2025 the only outcomes are Trump has won without conflict or the election is a contested mess and congress is deadlocked on certification and they will have moved to the vote by state in the house. In which case trump will be elected.

The Constitution doesn’t empower the court to interpret the constitution. If the executive chose to ignore the court it would be perfectly legal.