I don’t bother with the quality of the lock because I recognize the door itself as the weak point.

I made about 60k when I started working as a dev. At the rate I saved back then, I’d be well in millionaire territory within about 10 years had I not left it for grad school.

Everyone ignores prop 65 because the consequences are so distant. But anaphylaxis is very immediate. No one is going to take that kind of risk. That gives a much higher incentive to properly label things.

I’ve seen videos of those TikTok farms. It’s so much more dystopic than any fiction can come up with.

Many pay a lot more without ever learning this lesson. I’d say it was money well spent.

Something like “Fediverse Obituaries”?

Privacy concern for sure, but given that you can already tie different photos back to the same phone from lens artifacts, I don’t think this is going to make things much worse than they already are.

someone could create a virtual camera that would sign images

Anyone who produces cameras can publish a list of valid keys associated with their camera. If you trust the manufacturer, then you also trust their keys. If there’s no trusted source for the keys, then you don’t trust the signature.

I think there’s enough people who care about this that you can just provide the data and wait for someone to do the rest.

If you’re able to give precise instructions on what to do to resolve the issue, then couldn’t you also automate it and make it seamless from the user’s perspective?

industrial hardcore

What are some of your favourites in this category? Spotify hasn’t been giving me any good recommendations on this front either.

I would argue that this is the entire value proposition of Spotify. I may not own the music, but I have all the artist and song names. I can always re-acquire them at any time.

We’ve had wireless phone chargers for a long time.

TIL Winners of the prize aren’t limited to people

We’re talking about it here because of her.

I don’t know if it would be correct to say that the civilians have nothing to do with the war. As far as I’m aware, the IDF’s intended target is all Palestinians, civilians included.

It may be worth editing your post to specify that you’re talking about LLMs. There’s no indication that this is your intent without reading your responses in the comment section.

Ethical meaning : “private”, "anonymous, “not training with your data”, “no censured”, “open source”…

Private, anonymous, and uncensored. Those are easy. There’s plenty of pre-trained LLMs out there that you can download and use however you like.

Not training with your data, not possible as far as I’m aware. LLMs rely on the availability of a huge quantity and diversity of data. There isn’t enough of that available that also come with consent of the creator for this usage.

Open source isn’t well defined for machine learning models. Lots of models have their code and weights available, so if that qualifies for you, that’s also easy to find. Huggingface hosts most of them.

TIL film photography isn’t vegan

To accomplish that, you would need power. In this capitalist society, power comes from money.

We can have static HTML websites, but that basically limits you to sharing static information (which, by the way, still have “bugs” in the form of typos). There’s already lots of great resources for that. Wikipedia, personal blogs, books (physical and electronic). That’s not usually what we’re on the internet for though. We’re here for interactivity. We want to connect with other people (e.g. Lemmy), and we want tools to help us with various problems we have (e.g. any portable software that just needs a browser to run). Avoiding JS would hinder that goal. If you just want to read, go to your local library, take out a book, and start reading. Or get an e-reader and download some e-books.

You also point out the problem of online privacy. While JS does empower the tracking, it also does way more than that. The solution shouldn’t be to throw out the baby with the bath water.

I don’t think its ever been implemented, so probably not. You wouldn’t want to trust everyone the same way independent of their distance in the trust network. It would definitely be easy to exploit if you did with just a single bad actor and one gullible person. It might even be valuable to assign different weights to each of your direct trust connections.