Why do you like to use this site if you know it’s trying to abuse you? There are countless others out there.
Why do you like to use this site if you know it’s trying to abuse you? There are countless others out there.
Other unexploded ordinance dropped by the United States
Dropping bylaws on the masses
Wasn’t blocking of third-party cookies already an option for quite some time now? What’s different with this version that it’s mentioned as a new feature?
California is at least taking a step forward in legislating that “sellers” can’t call it a purchase if you’re only getting a revocable license. Shops wouldn’t be allowed to use the word “buy” or “purchase” unless you get to own the product.
A knowledgeable user will be aware of these shortcomings of so-called “ownership” of digital goods, but the average person doesn’t read license agreements and does not understand that their purchase can be revoked at any time by the seller.
The average person makes a purchase and expects to own the item in question.
No, you would suffer incredible pain from being unable to evacuate CO2.
You know how painful it gets when you hold your breath to your physical limit? That’s CO2 building up in your body. Just going hypoxic on its own isn’t painful, the pain is the body’s response to having too much CO2.
If that were true, they would cost way more to buy.
“It’s not comparable to the Holocaust. Germany killed 6 million…”
There are fewer than 6 million people in all of Palestine. If that’s their cutoff, they can eradicate everyone and “it still wouldn’t be as bad.” That’s probably their thought process.
I thought it was the opposite, that they can’t sell lower on other marketplaces, but they can do what they want with their keys.
Once you put it on the internet, it’s there forever.
Sony still releasing games on PS4. Still remasters PS4 game.
and then required prices be 5% lower than MSRP on other stores
That’s something that Steam doesn’t allow, which means the only way to have lower prices is for Epic to pay for an exclusivity deal. Because who’s going to move to Epic if the only way is to lose out on Steam?
I think part of the Steam contract for publishers is that they can’t sell their games cheaper elsewhere. So anyone wanting to compete with Steam on price needs to sell games that are in demand but not already on Steam. And Epic is really the only company with the pull to get that to happen, but the only way for them to do it is to get exclusivity, which gamers hate.
A-coodle-doodle-doo!
Their goal was to make it as difficult as possible. Sure eminent domain was a possibility, but they expected it and I imagine planned to fight it.
Boycotts only work when the group boycotting is large enough to impact the bottom line.
Most gamers just don’t care enough about accounts and launchers to boycott a game or company. They just want to come home from work and play games.
Perhaps it’s the traces of cocaine left over on those bills?
Not only that, they’re all berries.
I guess you can call it byproducts. The bulbs have a strange creamy texture on the inside, but the outside is also quite fibrous. You wouldn’t make a burger from that.
That makes sense and sounds better.
They worded it as “support for blocking third-party cookies” which sounds like reframing the system that was already in place as something new, rather than something actually new.