Wouldn’t this have to be sabotage since it’s not sustainable long term? I understand the quarterly greeds doing their thing, but this isn’t sustainable.

Glenwood is just one of nearly 400 health care facilities owned by MPT and rented out to hospital chains. Nine companies that leased hospitals from MPT have gone bankrupt—including Steward, Glenwood’s former operator. And while dozens of hospitals have been sold, entangled in bankruptcy proceedings, or become depleted shells, MPT’s top brass has earned millions.

It’s not about whether they want it or not, it’s whether they can get away with it or not.

Dude, I hope you try to quit those too. If you’ve ever met someone who can’t breathe from COPD, it’s a tough time for them.

How are you liking piefed? It seems to have better user tools.

I could see this coming. I posted two different headlines, one from Politico EU and one from Politico US only. They are significantly different:

• Trump rails against ‘NOTHING’ Epstein case after WSJ report (US only)

• MAGA world leaps to Trump’s defense over alleged Epstein letter (Europe)

Hey NY Times, fuck you.

Mr. Trump has never been accused of wrongdoing in connection with the Epstein case, and has said he had “no idea” that Mr. Epstein was abusing young women. In response to a request for comment about the president’s history with Mr. Epstein, Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, said that Mr. Trump had barred Mr. Epstein from his Mar-a-Lago club “for being a creep.”

https://archive.is/Qtj0f#selection-735.0-739.284

As per the linked sources from the compilation:https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/49344563

2016: Katie Johnson filed a lawsuit alleging Trump raped her at age 13 at Epstein’s NYC property. She claimed he tied her to a bed and threatened her family. A witness, Tiffany Doe, supported her. Johnson later withdrew the case after death threats and hacking of her lawyer’s site. Sworn video

Al Jazeera has gotten really, really bad for US news. I think their world news is still okay though.

IME, as many as you can handle and for the most part, trust. The Guardian is probably one of the best, but still shits out a huge turd like today’s Obama story. If it’s 80% pretty good, then I’ll keep checking them, the rest are left to others to comb through.

It ticks up depending on the timing and comment. The downvotes come in slow enough to be no more than 3ish. This place is so small that you can really tell their patterns.

He doth protest too much. He may not have drawn the picture, but he definitely signed it. Either way, no good because he approved of its message.

I’m sorry you have to deal with that

Thanks, but it really is no big deal. I’m in a lot of the politics spaces, so it’s expected there.

I will say to anyone reading this, to upvote comments as much as you think you can. Some new people really do care about upvotes and downvotes. It’s a better vibe too if the authentic people are getting upvoted.

If you watch the video that’s posted elsewhere in the comments, he’s definitely not 100% in reality. There is a huge difference between neuro-divergence and what he’s saying. The parts they took out for the article could be construed as neuro-divergent, which is why I wasn’t entirely sure. But when you look at the entirety of what he was saying, he’s not in our world completely in his mental state.

I have a downvote follower, pay no attention to that. Sometimes it gets really bad, which makes me laugh because they have to do a lot of work to do that. I’m not sure who they think they’re hurting by having to possibly log out and log in with numerous alts. It’s a slow downvoting. Occasionally people really are downvoting me, which is fine too. The points really don’t matter.

Lol, I’m glad it’s not a rabbit hole I was prepared to go down. It looked like it was going to be one.

You’re right. I watched the video and a lot wasn’t included in the article.

Yeah, I just edited my comment. I watched the video and a lot wasn’t included in the article. He’s 100% not right.

I see what you’re saying, but here is what I think he’s describing:

• First paragraph: He’s saying that there is a hidden operation to take down people.
• Second paragraph: He’s saying that it’s vague enough and has no definitive answer, so it sends people down loopholes with no end.
• Third paragraph: This is the one that sounds the most unstable. He’s saying that people are implying he’s unstable and he’s sensing it in their words and actions. That they’re not replying like they used to and are making him feel crazy. Basically, the true meaning of gaslighting.
• Fourth paragraph: There is one individual behind it and the gaslighting is killing people. This one also supports instability.

Edit: I just watched the entire video. He’s unstable 100%

incredibly detailed understanding of ocean currents.

Wikipedia is no help in explaining this, could you expand on this a little?

I don’t use chatgpt, his diatribe seems to be setting off a lot of red flags for people. Is it the people coming after me part? He’s a billionaire, so I could see people coming after him. I have no idea of what he’s describing though. From a layman that isn’t a developer or psychiatrist, it seems like he’s questioning the ethics and it’s killing people. Am I not getting it right?