

He seems to be the pinnacle of US presidents. It has only been going down since him.
He seems to be the pinnacle of US presidents. It has only been going down since him.
Nothing will happen.
You are also forgetting the SuperPACs
Another factor which IMHO led to her lose was that she didn’t primary. So all the anger against Biden mostly transferred onto her. His blinding support to genocide, his greediness for the presidency, his support for big businesses, him breaking the railway workers strike just eroded any goodwill he did have.
He did good things but optics of these didn’t let good deeds to shine. They did cast a shadow over Kamala’s campaign too.
Republicans are trying to outlaw voting. Unless it is for their candidate.
She has no path forward clearing primary to fight for presidency.
1930s didn’t have satelite, America was great then, people segregated, supporting Nazis. Make America great again.
They are not doing it even today. If they are businessmen, they are not going to leave their businesses just because they are being taxed.
Let them, they don’t generate anything.
Other than your PC or Mac spying on you, you are in no danger.
A perfect presentation of American thinking.
" we bomb you to have peace with you"
It is never too late. It might be late to prevent but not to fight back. Even at times of martial law there is always something you can do to fight.
I misread and wondered when did systemd release cat as in the software not the animal.
Come on just own the country, from manifest destiny to slavery. From exporting dictators to exporting genocide.
You being uncomfortable doesn’t change the country.
It should be thank you to the non voters. They have merely removed the veneer of morality and democracy from the face of US.
Remember the snipers in college sent by Biden against students participating in Anti-Israel protests.
Please don’t misunderstand I never meant you were supporting genocide. What I meant was the framers had in their mind genocide when the constitution was made.
George Washington was a prospector and his motivation, in part if not whole, was the British restriction against surveying and annexing Indian lands.
How can giving voting rights to only land owning elites be for the ‘betterment of all’? How is disenfranchising the majority for the ‘betterment of all’? Even if we don’t count the slaves, how is not giving voting rights to women and poor for the ‘betterment of all’'? How is it any different from what is happening today, where people’s voting rights are being taken away other than the reasons? It was people wouldn’t know what’s better for them, now it is fake votes.
One could argue that as a fledgeling country early politicians did need the support of the rich slave owners. But it didn’t take 76 years to build the country. Secondly how it is different than politicians doing the dirty work for the corporate for their election today?
There is no way one could spin up a fantasy where genocide of indigenous people was for the ‘betterment of all’.
So now they are the biggest millitary and paramilitary spender. Cool.