Anybody got the whole article? Blocked from reading the entire thing unless I start a 7 day free trial, lol
Anybody got the whole article? Blocked from reading the entire thing unless I start a 7 day free trial, lol
thanks for this, seems like the most reasonable take.
That’s a perfect example, since I personally didn’t care about the references, it wasn’t for me. But I bet it was a trip for you, and that’s great! So no worries on whether a popular piece of art doesn’t resonate for you, it’s just not on your wavelength.
This is a cool read on that game, nice
It’s fine! Just what you like. there are countless things that are critically acclaimed that aren’t for me, I chalk it up to different perspectives on what art should do. People loved that “ready player one” book, but I thought it was trash lol.
It’s fine! Just like what you like. there are countless things that are critically acclaimed that aren’t for me, I chalk it up to different perspectives on what art should do. People loved that “ready player one” book, but I thought it was trash lol.
Carl Sagan was already mentioned, he’s def a favorite of mine. I’d also add Matt Mercer, everything I’ve seen of him makes it seems like he’s just a wonderful person all around.
Fuck. I mean, let’s wait and see, but def doesn’t sound good from here.
I think “A Tale of Two Sisters” is incredibly underrated, really great Korean ghost story. Acting is top notch, solid scares, and beautiful cinematography. Highly recommended!!
Really have to watch Poughkeepsie Tapes at some point, keep hearing crazy stuff about it!!!
Solid list, I can attest to all of these except coherence, which I haven’t seen yet. OP should watch some of these!!
Both, I would think. What’s currently undiscovered in reality will only be discovered by employing science, in some degree.
My thought exactly! If anything of the type OP mentioned did actually exist, it would now be in the realm of science! Science at its core is just observation.
Amazing! Do you happen to know where the root sets arose from?
What does independent mean here? Not influenced by a previous writing system? Does this imply that all other writing systems have a singular source?
I really love shit like this, feels like the golden age of computers and the internet
Appreciate the response, will def check it out now!!
lol this is the only response necessary