Why the torture?
I wonder how light-handed you’ll have to be to keep that market, election, and war info accurate.
Why the torture?
I wonder how light-handed you’ll have to be to keep that market, election, and war info accurate.
You’re just throwing shit at the wall man. You slap together strawmen in the form of a rhetorical question assigning a obviously weak position to the other commenter, over and over again. Why?
They weren’t defending the targeting of civilians in WWII.
They weren’t arguing that Hamas is not antisemitic.
They weren’t claiming Hamas is brave or pure in spirit.
They don’t claim Hamas has justification.
They don’t justify acts of destruction and terrorizing Jewish communities.
On and on and on. Do you always operate this way?
Lol, thought that was just a pet name for a second there, poopkins
I worked really hard on a tailspin DVD for a niece done years ago. I probably searched through a lot of images for art.
I hope I made it with an additional "Dumbass spells it “tailspin DVD” flag
Shit I’m sorry man. I’m sure you’re not that bad. It’ll pass.
I don’t know about a documentary but I believe economist Stephen Levitt (sp?) put this theory forward.
Holy shit.
Even if Covenant Eyes is honest in their (batshit) intentions, all that eavesdropping and compromised devices makes them a juicy target.
I went from routinely missing to never. You absolutely should set that up.
I can relate on the losing awareness aspect. So, I also put them all on my calendar in red (recurring, of course) then switch to green with the title appended w/ “DONE” when I’ve paid it, or verified auto pay is scheduled.
I agree, but can’t figure out why. Maybe because it wasn’t wildly adopted?
Hah yeah I see now. Simile out something like that
As an adopted Ohioan, I feel like I gotta tell you Vegas ain’t in California
You have a point that there’s a huge difference in the life of a minimum wage family and a family able to invest 6 figures. Context matters though and I think the point was that they didn’t have an overwhelming amount that can force success; we’re talking about a financial-secure and supported start that enables pursuit of things that are unlikely to pan out. Still no small luxury, by any means.
FWIW 0.1% is already 38 million dollars (net worth, US, 2012 data).
E: Speaking of context, you were specifically talking about commonality between the, idk, bottom 1-10%, top 1-10%, and (whatever is ultra-wealthy). So my point may be the one made out-of-context.