Hockey exists btw.
Hockey exists btw.
Calling it unilateral restraint is absurd though. It’s like bragging about cutting out Coke from your diet while drinking a Pepsi.
That’s a weird statement for a country that’s been actively supporting multiple militias in the region for decades.
This is how you know it’s a work of fiction and not a direct insert of British ideals.
Your assuming those involved are remotely rational. Once you get to the point where someone is willing to kill themselves to kill others it doesn’t really matter about anyone else’s strength and resolve.
Just curious, did they also investigate the incident with Amon Ra that made the Netflix documentary? It seems to happen a lot, not sure you can successfully ban drunk assholes.
It’s overstated because this age is the end of ignorance. We now know about events from everywhere around the world almost instantly. At a global level something terrible is always happening. Even just 30 years ago that wasn’t really the case, things still happened but it wasn’t as widely known. Humans haven’t learned how to process information across a global scope, which leads to increased panic and uncertainty.
You just copy, but don’t from a lot of places. If you only copy from a single thing your work is a simple derivative of that one thing. If you steal from 20 sources, that work is a masterful blend of multiple influences.
It may have got mentioned in passing in relation to the nukes, but most people only remember those.
I believe the term originated with Yahtzee during the military and tactical shooter crazy in the 2010s. It referred to games that paraded players through various spectacles and rooms full of chest high walls, until enough time had passed to call it a campaign.
The middle east only spirals to a world war if other countries start their own shit hoping that the existing conflict is too distracting. The US putting boots on the ground in the middle east is a great chance for China to start shit in Taiwan or south Korea.
The saving grace is there aren’t that many countries that can escalate anything global besides the US and China. Russia seems fully occupied in Ukraine, and Europe is still a joke for military power currently.
Unions have limited leverage, using it to stop automation is like fighting the tide. They should be arguing for training for positions running the automated cranes, priority in hiring for new positions, job placement assistance, tuition reimbursement, or other things to help employees.
AI has already been getting used increasingly on even quality movies. The good parts get renamed like ADR.
Letting the tools run wild will lead to bad results, that doesn’t mean they don’t have a place in future productions.
Artificial apple flavor is awful and that is what most companies would use.
Non-state militias attacking a country is infinite casus belli for a state to retaliate.
Both are happening. Samples of casual writing are more valuable to use to generate an article than research papers though.
South Africa has been far more helpful to Palestine than any amount of missiles launched at civilians will ever be.
Demands against automation are just as stupid as the Hollywood unions demands against AI. It’s a get on board or get run over situation.
There are many totally automated ports outside the US, unions have fought to keep the US in the stone age as far as ports are concerned. The first automated port was opened in 93.