• 5 Posts
  • 65 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 20th, 2023

help-circle


  • Somewhat pedantical quibble, really just because I find it interesting: It’s not exactly limited by barrel length. We can make faster burning, higher powered propellants, which you can get the full energy out of with a shorter barrel. The reason we don’t is because that means you have a higher pressure inside the chamber and, even if your gun doesn’t explode, you face more erosion from use. Your metallurgy ends up being the limiting factor, as it’s all about how strong you can make your chamber. I just think it’s cool because guns are a great example of how inter-related technologies are and how everything depends on everything else. Take a design for a machinegun back to the Napoleonic era and it will be worthless because without smokeless powder it will jam and clog after a couple rounds. Take back a formula for smokeless powder and it will be worthless because you don’t know how to make brass cartridges. Try to make brass cartridges and you’ll find you lack the precision tooling, and so on.










  • Thanks everyone for your feedback. I get that this is a contentious issue, and I appreciate everyone being nice to eachother (and me) while discussing it. (Those of you that didn’t, you know who you are)

    Based on the upvoted comments and the arguments that I found most cogent, I will be banning generative AI in the community.

    A few related issues were raised, and I’d like to explain how I intend to address them:

    https://ttrpg.network/post/26260249/17201676 Rhaedus raised concerns about the difficulty in determining if something is AI generated or not. As with all rule enforcement on this site, I’ll be relying on you all to report suspected violations, and I promise I’ll give you my best-effort attempt to make a fair judgement.

    https://ttrpg.network/post/26260249/17206513 Carl and others raised concerns that this might impact posts predominantly about human-created content that have some trivial or incidental amount of AI generated comment. In such a situation, if the use of Gen AI is really that minimal, it would never come to my attention in the first place, and therefore wouldn’t get removed anyway.

    Several users advocated for an explicit carve out for discussions about the use of AI, which is a good idea and will be included in the rule.

    Thank you again for your input and your civility.








  • Hey, sorry for the delayed response, I have been traveling.

    That rule originally came from when we were a much busier subreddit. I recognize it’s harder to really be “active” now, with so few threads. If they want to try to be a part of the community, I have no objection to them making a post about their game. No specific definition of what “active” means in terms of number of comments or anything, we’d just like to avoid the kind of drive-by spam of “buy my game kthnxbai”