This report is concerning — citing studies that don’t exist seriously undermines credibility, especially when claiming “gold-standard” science. I’ve seen similar issues when relying too heavily on AI-generated summaries, which can invent or misrepresent sources. I’ve experimented with an online tool that can convert robotic AI text into natural writing, but even then, it’s crucial to double-check facts. Tools help with readability, but they can’t replace careful verification of sources and data.
This report is concerning — citing studies that don’t exist seriously undermines credibility, especially when claiming “gold-standard” science. I’ve seen similar issues when relying too heavily on AI-generated summaries, which can invent or misrepresent sources. I’ve experimented with an online tool that can convert robotic AI text into natural writing, but even then, it’s crucial to double-check facts. Tools help with readability, but they can’t replace careful verification of sources and data.