![](https://lemmy.sdf.org/pictrs/image/16a091ac-6d39-4707-9a2d-3575132a84fa.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
Copyright has nothing to do with plagiarism. It is literally about the mechanical work of producing copies, which used to be expensive.
science and music. and beer. and dogs.
Copyright has nothing to do with plagiarism. It is literally about the mechanical work of producing copies, which used to be expensive.
If you can give a reference to any such book, I’d be very interested to see it.
Most of what you said is exactly my point. It’s true the word Linux, used properly, refers to a kernel and not an operating system. But that’s not the way the word is used in practice, and it is not what OP meant when they used it. They meant " an OS with the Linux kernel and GNU userspace utilities." When the word Linux is used that way, Android is not Linux.
they are operating systems that use the linux kernel, just like GNU/Linux (aka “Linux”) does.
kernel != operating system
For better or worse the more correct name GNU/Linux did not catch on and is universally shortened to Linux. Android uses the Linux kernel, but is not GNU/Linux, and therefore is not Linux.
You have to, if your horse literally can’t make it across. It may not go well, but you have no choice.
It didn’t work for Florida though. Desantis was running for the nomination, not for president. Had he won the nomination, he would have had to resign as governor.
Dred Scott?
Sometimes precedent is plain wrong.
ETA: not in this instance though. This was a time they should have respected precedent.
Hah! Ya got me!
But of course I’m talking about the adjective punk, as in " punk rock," which is an entirely other word than the noun puncke, (or, more modern, punk ) which Shakespeare used.
ETA: I don’t mean to imply they’re not related They just aren’t the same word. And one of them was created in the 1970s.
I agree that the word punk came to be associated with aesthetics, almost exclusively. But that is very far from where it started, and it is frustrating for those who started it to see it coopted like this. The association of the word with anything other than anti-consumerism is just " branding" at its worst.
I was a tween when the first version of “punk” came around (yes, that makes me old). I think I can say with authority that the ideals were: anti-corporate, anti-consumerism, and anti-commercialism. Ever since then people have tried to sum it up (and marginalize it) as “DIY.” But that falls well short of what it really was.
Of course, the second it showed any sign of viable popularity, the forces of capitalism, well…, capitalized on it. The obvious examples are bullshit, high production, made-for-tv bands like Green Day getting sold as punk rock. But does anyone remember Urban Outfitters? Holy crap, the open, unashamed corporate pandering!
It’s not about nostalgia. It’s about passive aggressively needling Musk, and it works and I love it.
You seem to be taking this a bit personally - did someone pour water in your bag?
An eye for an eye is not justice, and it doesn’t lead to peace.
That’s so weird because a quote from WaPo had him saying he could hear the sincerity in her apology.
rtfa. That was never implied by either side.
Of course, in New Dehli it was 49 degrees, not 121.
Sorry for the snark. ;-)
Thankfully, it is not the country yet. It is just a sizeable and highly motivated minority. Fuck them.
Allegedly.