• ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I can almost understand the idea when applied to extremely dangerous individuals. There should absolutely be some kind of separate system for people who are too dangerous to be able to reintegrate into society.

    A one size fits all justice system is a terrible way to run a society

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      In most cases, though, you can get those individuals on actual charges. People aren’t usually violent completely out of the blue and a suspicion of future violence might come from prior acts of violence or securing materials for mass violence (like building explosive devices)…

      The rationale for detaining someone for public safety is almost always coming from prior acts that we have laws for. We should force law enforcement to actually use those laws since they’ll have a burden of proof to enact enforcement… the IPP loophole is awful because it leaves no legal recourse - there was no trial you can appeal or at least argue against.

    • andyburke@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      That is called “life in prison without the chance for parole,” at least in the US.

      • Nomecks@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s called “Three strikes you’re out” in some states. Commit three crimes of any severity and go away for a long time.