• Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yeah, because it’s all just a binary were people vote by party only!

    West Virginia is an extremely poor state, has the worst health of any state, is generally pretty pro-union and loves a political dynasty.

    Joe Manchin is the nephew of a prominent WV politician, in favor of the ACA and pretty good at pretending to care about miners. THAT’S why he kept winning in a supposedly deep red state.

    If we find a good progressive candidate who ACTUALLY cares about poor people and labor rights, is in favor of Medicare for All, and has a relative who used to be State Treasurer or something, that candidate would be able to win in West Virginia WITHOUT being a corrupt conservative ass.

    • idiomaddict@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      I don’t know much about West Virginia, except that most of the people running it still havedeep political ties to the Hatfields/McCoys feud. I handled litigated coal miner’s lung insurance cases for a while, and that came up again and again, to the point that that our local legal manager would monitor the family ties of local defense firms and judges.

      I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s really what got manchin elected, but it’s also something that could work for lots of potential candidates

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      In 2012 Mittens won WV by 27 points. Tell us more about how these ultra progressive union lovers will quit voting for Bain Capital guys as soon as the perfect socialist candidate comes along.