• poo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    5 months ago

    On one hand, biting that hand that feeds

    On the other, I’ve lived in buildings with AirBnBs and they’re a scourge. The owners and renters of short term rental properties are mostly (not all) awful - residents should be owning property, not spoiled rich landlords eating up space for tourists. Fuck AirBnB.

    I also visited Spain last month and I’ve never felt so unwelcomed in my life while in Barcelona and would never go back, so I guess the anti-tourism is working 😂

    • kamenLady.@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      5 months ago

      I can understand that locals are revolting around the world. The amount of tourism exploded in the last decades. The way tourists are behaving all around doesn’t help.

    • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Barcelona is a diverse economic engine; it’s not a tourism monocrop town. It doesn’t need your patronage.

        • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Did you think I wouldn’t notice you creating alt account dvb@lemmy.world today for the express purpose of following me around and downvoting? I guess I really hit a nerve. How embarrassingly petty.

    • kiagam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      most places in the world require that you have a license for tourist renting. In theory, they inspect each unit before giving the license, to make sure it is safe. And in theory airbnb requires that license before allowing you to list on their site. If you don’t have the license, you get fined, same as if you opened a store without stablishing a formal company

      • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        It depends on the city really. I find that some cities hotels are just a way better value but other time air b and b can be good. Like for cabins and beach houses for example.

        • xthexder@l.sw0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          5 months ago

          Renting out cabins and beach houses makes way more sense, since those are typically places you wouldn’t live in full time. The rest of the short term housing rentals end up driving up the cost of living.

      • 01011@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Depends on the location and the number of people in your party. Sometimes it does work out cheaper to rent an apartment or even a house instead of several hotel rooms. Kitchen space is always a boon, I’m rarely impressed by overpriced restaurant fare and prefer to cook for myself when possible. It can also be helpful if you’re traveling with pets.

    • cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      47
      ·
      5 months ago

      Obviously it’s the landlord who do it for profit. It’s not like the tourist just came to the city and shove the residents out of their own home or something like that.

      All this would do is shift the profits to hotel chains. The rent will never go down and the landlord will never sell.

      • Snowclone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        5 months ago

        Air BnB makes short term rentals profitable, a lot of people own property on debt and pay it with airbnb profits, if that dries up, they will sell. They’ll have to. Hotels are one of the most significant sources of tax revenue in tourist locations, airbnb offer lower prices because they circumvent the tax system and don’t pay a tax rate similar to hotels, the government wants the tourist at hotels. Period.

        • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          5 months ago

          People need to understand that when a tech company is “disrupting” it means they’re exploiting legal loopholes.

            • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              lol! That’s great.

              Imagine if Uber had done it ethically. All the app, none of the shady. Would’ve been a WAY slower start but I want to believe the excellent technology would’ve been enough for them to win. No “broken” card readers, no scamming women in countries with foreign currency (former colleague’s anecdote), no having to lie to get the driver to let you in before telling them later your real destination, reduced racial discrimination…


              Also since Google thinks this is OK:

              http://m.youtube.com/shorts/RZJfBEvt51g?feature=share&embeds_referring_euri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F&source_ve_path=[tracker?IDK]&feature
              

              reduced it to the usual (/ working Piped mirror)

        • Censored@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          AirBNB pays taxes too. They don’t circumvent the system in Barcelona, that was fixed a long time ago. Now they just displace locals because the nightly rate is higher than the monthly rate. Even if it’s empty most of the time. Which is a real shame.

      • sunzu@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Somebody getting high on their own farts.

        Bro as soon as these “owners” go cash flow negative, they will sell. That’s how’s parasites operate lol

        Also making money 101

        It seems like people can’t conceive idea of price going down lol

      • reverendz@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        Back when there were “mom and pop” AirBnb, maybe this was a bad thing. Now, a huge number of rentals are owned by companies with big portfolios specializing in short term rentals.

        It’s become a really big problem in certain cities.

        I don’t see this as a bad thing.

      • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        5 months ago

        what makes you think there isnt airbnb operators who have a chain of flats they rent out?

      • roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        5 months ago

        I guy I work with owned two condos in a development. The HOA passed a rule banning short term rentals. There were a lot of units being advertised on Airbnb and similar services so he put them on the market when he heard the rule was being proposed to beat the rush.

        He managed to sell one at market but the second one didn’t sell before all the other Airbnb landlords listed their places too. He had to take about 10% below market for the second one.

        Now those two places are owner occupied, and one of them got a nice deal (I don’t know about the ones sold by other people). And everything that sold in that area probably went for a little less for a while due to the glut on the market.

        Making renting less profitable works. People aren’t landlords because it’s fun. They do it for the money. Take away the money and you have less landlords.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        The rent will never go down and the landlord will never sell.

        1. Thanks for proving capitalism doesn’t work.
        2. Some countries have seizures if land isn’t used for its intended purpose. But quick search says Spain doesn’t have it.
  • Censored@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s going to hurt small time renters. I stayed in an AirBNB in 2013, it was rented out by a lovely family. It was a fantastic experience, staying in a nice neighborhood off the beaten path. We stayed for a few months, too, and we were respectful, not puking all over the place etc. A lot of locals invested in furnishing rentals for AirBNB. At least, that was the scene 9 years ago. No idea what it’s like now.

    • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I had a good time in an Airbnb years ago, too, but it’s gotten more expensive over time. It’s not even that much cheaper than hotels now whenever I check.

      And we have to admit that while they serve tourists like us, it’s costing locals their chance to get housing when landlords are buying up units and houses and saving them all to rent out on Airbnb.

      • CascadianGiraffe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        I worked for a low income apartment complex that started doing AirBnB. It’s already a 2-3 year waiting list to get a rent controlled low income apartment but they were taking units off the market because they could make more money renting them by the night.

  • Fugtig Fisk@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yeah sure airbnb will be affected but i dont believe the blow to them will be as big as for the homeowners in Barcelona who offer their homes for rent through airbnb

    Airbnb will do just fine without Barcelona. Not even sure they will notice, to be fair!

    • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      They won’t do just fine if everywhere starts doing this, and homes can actually go to residents, and not shit bag Airbnb landlords. Anything that keeps the investor class out of real estate is a good thing.

          • Fugtig Fisk@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            I rent and i am happy to rent. I could pretty easily buy if i wanted but i really appreciate the option to rent, and move to an other place whenever i feel like it, without having to consider losses or having to sell before i can move.

            My landlord is a decent human being and offers a service like any other company.

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      5 months ago
      1. a
      2. b
      3. c
      4. Very long text, that is longer than one line, to demonstrate how very long text is formatted.

      Very long text, that is longer than one line, to demonstrate how very long text is formatted.

      • mPony@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago
        • Thankyou for the help.
        • I tried the bullet list before and it didn’t seem to be working; it was probably me, though.
        • let’s see if it works like this
  • e$tGyr#J2pqM8v@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Airbnb sometimes offers a good user experience but it’s not hard to understand that Airbnb is not benefiting the city’s population. And I really don’t mind going to a hotel. Actually I prefer it since I have a better idea of what to expect. Good for Barcelona, let the world follow their example!

    • wesley@yall.theatl.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think it can benefit in certain situations. Like when we traveled to a European country we stayed in an AirBnB that was being rented out while the family who lived there was in summer vacation. So they essentially got to subsidize their vacation with Airbnb.

      As far as units that are permanently Airbnb style short term rentals though I agree. Terrible for the actual residents in the city.

  • Chef_Boyardee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    5 months ago

    “Wait, what happened? We were making money. Oh, our country has been broke for a while now? Well, can we call the cruise ship guys?”

  • Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    2028… so plenty of time for appeals and there will be basically no downward pressure on the housing market there since there is no big rush to offload 10k units that won’t make money.

    It’s too bad, would have been better if they just revoked it immediately and banned it in the city.