New GNOME dialog on the right:

Apple’s dialog:

They say GNOME isn’t a copy of macOS but with time it has been getting really close. I don’t think this is a bad thing however they should just admit it and then put some real effort into cloning macOS instead of the crap they’re making right now.

Here’s the thing: Apple’s design you’ll find that they carefully included an extra margin between the “Don’t Save” and “Cancel” buttons. This avoid accidental clicks on the wrong button so that people don’t lose their work when they just want to click “Cancel”.

So much for the GNOME, vision and their expert usability team :P

      • TCB13@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        4 months ago

        My point is: if you want to copy / be inspired by others at least do it right.

        • sunzu@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Bro… There is but so many ways to effectively organize something basic like that jfc.

          Best or standard practice, ever heard of the concept?

        • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          So, copying is making something identical. But something that’s different would rationally be called not copying, whereas you categorize it as poor copying. Interesting.

          Ever hear of two things just being similar? We are talking about a UI - these things have always followed patterns that change as usage patterns change in the industry. I think you must be young and/or inexperienced because this kind of trend goes back to the ‘80s.

          • TCB13@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            But something that’s different would rationally be called not copying, whereas you categorize it as poor copying. Interesting.

            I would categorize it as poor copying because the copy doesn’t conform to the design / UX patterns that were present on the “original” work.