I get it, Biden is old and that’s a problem, but why doesn’t anyone seem to have a problem with the fact that Trump is almost the same age, has 34 felonies, raped at least 2 women, went to Epstein’s Island 11 times, sexualized his own daughter, stole classified documents, aligned himself with Xi and Putin, and can’t remember common names?

Is all of that really better than being 2½ years older than he is right now?

  • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Because we know he won’t. He knows he’s unwelcome by the majority of the people. That just makes his worshippers praise him even more.

    What do you expect…Democrats ask him to step down because he’s a convicted felon? He’s gonna listen?

    Republicans to have him step down…why? Because he said lies(that they believe) and sounded good saying them?

    Biden we at least know is receptive. And he’s got an amazing career behind him. Losing the presidency, as an incumbent, to Trump (the incumbent he just barely defeated four years ago when he exuded much more confidence when he spoke against him) would be a terrible way to end it.

    There’s nothing in the world more powerful than a good story.

  • Taohumor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Mainly cuz no one cares this is all internet shit flinging. No one talking about anything will do anything besides smell their own fart.

    Also people are more concerned with making sure they have enough to eat and can pay rent for the month.

    It’s your privilege to spend all your free time reading about politics, make sure to check it.

  • EnderMB@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    The problem the Republican party seems to have right now is that it’s caught in a bizarre cult of personality, where the only viable candidate is Donald Trump. Eight years have been dedicated to a man that likely won’t be around for another eight due to his age and lifestyle. Donald Trump can’t drop out, because to many he IS the Republican Party.

    Put succinctly, if Trump were to drop out, could you realistically see him backing another candidate, without making it about himself?

    In some ways it’s petrifying that Trump could win. In another, it’s hilarious to think that IF Trump were to lose, how would the Republicans recover in four years? Trump will never not make it about himself, and I bet he’ll put himself on the ballot for as long as he can, further eroding the right.

  • John_McMurray@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    9 days ago

    Bidens a crooked pedo, accused of rape repeatedly, with severe dementia and a crooked family n past also, so…?

        • John_McMurray@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          9 days ago

          Well maybe you should stop engaging in idiotic conspiracy theories and admit these are documented fact, confirmed by and in legal proceedings

              • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                That’s not how it’s going to work here. You made the claim. The onus is on you to support it with evidence when asked because the time it takes to figure out that there is none, shouldn’t be something anyone but you should have to endure.

                • John_McMurray@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 days ago

                  Oh, so you’re in charge now? I don’t take orders from people completely unaware of the recent news or how to look stuff up. Speaks to their intelligence, that they’d even try this.

          • subignition@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            You should get your oxygen saturation checked, pretty sure you’re slowly suffocating your brain cells passively by existing

  • alekwithak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    Because not a single Republican has been held accountable for their actions since Nixon. Prove me wrong.

  • Cornpop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    Because we know he won’t. It’s pointless. They both need to just fucking die.

  • duderium2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    9 days ago

    I mean, both trump and biden are genocidal lunatics so they should both be in prison, along with anyone who excuses them.

  • Red_October@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Most of the people who think Trump should drop out have been loudly opposing him for a long time. There isn’t just one single thing they object to, no great unifying theme they can point at and say “This is why he should not run,” because Everything about him is a reason why he should absolutely not be president. Even his Felony conviction is, while perhaps more than a drop, just a splash in the bucket of what should be utterly career ending circumstances.

    The people who still support Trump don’t care about any of that. They’re not going to suddenly see one particular turn-off and decide that’s it, that’s why Trump should back out. They’re committed, in too deep, they can’t back down now because it would mean the Libs were actually right all along, and that presents, to them, an existential threat. And in the end, it’s the Republican way.

    When Democrats, even popular ones, fuck up, other Democrats are much more likely to turn on them, to call for and get resignations. With Republicans, that’s almost unheard of. Republicans take Part Unity to an extreme, circling the wagons and assuming a full defensive position no matter how incredibly abhorrent the crime, no matter how blatant the evidence. Today we’re seeing the perfect example. Biden fucked up a debate, stumbling over his own words like an old man well past his prime, and the party is calling for him to step down. Trump has built his whole political career on stumbling over his own words, with the only cogent statements he manages being blatant lies, and his people would rather murder their neighbors than see him lose.

    • Psycoder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      39
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      As much as I agree with everything you say, there is one more thing that needs to be said.

      I started watching the debate fully aware of the fact that Trump was a POS. Trump was a POS in 2016, 2020, and 2024. On the other hand, I started watching the debate hoping to see president Biden could make Trump look even dumber. What I got was a very clearly senile guy that failed to make coherent sentences 10+ times in a 90 minute debate.

      Trump was who he has always been during the debate. Biden was senile during the debate. At this point I’m not asking Biden to drop because I like Trump. That is wrong. I hate Trump. I’m asking Biden to drop because I know he won’t be able to beat Trump. On the other hand, he might have no problem beating medicare.

      • teft@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        9 days ago

        Oh look another super new account posting doom and gloom anti biden stuff. So weird.

      • InternetUser2012@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        9 days ago

        I love when trolls post bullshit like this, it just fires up the democratic voters. Biden will win with more votes than the last time he beat that 34 time convicted felon, rapist, loser.

        • Psycoder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          8 days ago

          Ok, go ahead with Biden. I decided to take a break from politics. I’ll be sitting out this election.

          Enjoy.

              • Lightor@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 days ago

                I mean, if anything your lending more credibility to Trump if Biden stays in, kinda playing the “both sides” game. Especially saying things like “I know he won’t be about to beat Trump”, basically telling people it’s pointless to vote for Biden.

          • InternetUser2012@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            8 days ago

            Lol, your account is six days old, nothing but troll posts. Bro, if you’re not a bot, you’re clearly not American, so you can just stfu K? Ty, go slob that putin knob boy.

        • prunerye@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          9 days ago

          Anyone who disagrees with you isn’t a troll. Biden looked how he looked, and moderates/independents don’t have the same appetite for copium as you do.

          • InternetUser2012@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            9 days ago

            Sounds like something a troll would say. Your post history is also matching what a troll/bot is. I agree 100% that just because someone disagrees with me they aren’t necessarily a bot, BUT, there’s a fuckton of bots/trolls out there now to do what they did in 2016.

  • StaySquared@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    8 days ago

    It’s not age. It’s competency. There’s 100 year olds that are more competent than Biden. I’m not calling Biden stupid. I’m saying like the rest of the fkin world has been saying for the past few years, Biden’s mind is degrading.

      • Facebones@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        And accurate, fighting both existing and new minimum marriage age requirements has been a priority for Republicans in like 10+ different states over the past 5 years or so.

  • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 days ago

    Because Trump is winning in the polls handily and has robust support from his base.

    Biden is the opposite: he’s losing in the polls, his disapproval numbers are the highest in the history of modern polling, and many of the people that will vote for him will do it only because they have to.

    • GladiusB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      Trump supporters have to as well but for different reasons. If they don’t drink the Kool-aid and play along socially they are ostracized. Which doesn’t help anyone.

      • Colour_me_triggered@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        As a non American, trump winning will destabilise things in Europe way more than it will in America. The cunt’s said Russia can do what they want with NATO member states. It means all aid to Ukraine stops and Ukraine will lose because Putin has an endless supply of meat to take it if Ukraine can’t find the artillery shells. Russia will turn Ukraine’s now highly trained, well equipped, and battle hardened army against Poland. Major bloodbath! After enough primary school children have died on the frontline the Baltic states will be next, followed by Scandinavia.

        Sure Europe will eventually stop them but at a massive cost. And that’s only if China doesn’t openly arm Russia or send troops. The only way to avoid it is if the US and Europe remain tight.

        • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          That’s being an alarmist to the point of absurdity.

          Trump can say a lot of things. He can say he’ll leave NATO. He can say he’ll stop sending aid to Ukraine.

          He can say whatever he wants, and I have no doubt the idiot actually believes it. After all, he said he was going to build a wall and make Mexico pay for it. He Said he was going to deport all DACA child. Hell, if I remember correctly, he said during the last campaign that he was going to leave NATO as well unless they fucking paid him, like it’s some sort of protection racket.

          Despite the recent SC ruling, and despite four years of failing to actually do anything he said he could do, he still believes he’s a god-king. But with the exception of a presidential decree, which can be blocked by congress; nothing he’s fucking babbling about can just “be done” on his word. It has to pass Congress and the Senate, which will, despite the eventual winner of the presidency, remain close enough in seats for cooler heads to stop his bullshit. There are enough republicans, even in a Trump administration, that would never dream of fucking up that much.

          The point is, Trump is a fucking idiot. And while the supreme court has made him effectively immune to criminal prosecution, his ability to do almost anything without eventually bumping up against the actual adults in the room is still pretty limited.

          If he actually had the power to do what he says he can, he would have done it in his first term. But even in a party of of racists and MAGA, there are enough adults to keep him distracted with colouring books.

          • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            The point is, Trump is a fucking idiot. And while the supreme court has made him effectively immune to criminal prosecution, his ability to do almost anything without eventually bumping up against the actual adults in the room is still pretty limited.

            The problem is that Trump (if elected) gets to appoint a bunch of yes-man lackeys to all the cabinet positions, meaning that there are fewer of those adults in the room to stop him from doing stupid shit.

          • Colour_me_triggered@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 days ago

            The heritage Foundation has been putting the right people in the right places for a long fucking time. Trump is only a foot in the door. The fundamentalists and far right will probably whack him themselves once he’s elected. They are using his stupidity and cult following to gain power. If you don’t resist, it’s going to be a handmade’s tale type dystopia for you and a return to pan continental war for us.

            I don’t envy your position tbh.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        capitalism just progressing to it’s natural end stage.

        Also…

        First Past The post voting artificially limits the number of political parties to two. This allows the legacy political parties to run incredibly weak candidates since there is no competition in the electoral system.

        With a more representative voting system (much like Ranked Choice voting) people would be free to vote for the person that best represents them, while still counting their vote if that candidate doesn’t win.

        • Taohumor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          I’d run but no one will vote for someone with no criminal record and refuses to lie.

        • Kedly@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          "First Past The post voting artificially limits the number of political parties to two. "

          Kiiiind of, Canada has fptp as well and we have about 4.5ish competitive parties, Liberal Party, Conservative Party, NDP (“socialist” party), Bloc Quebecois (Quebec focussed party [used to be a sepratist party, but has evolved to just focus on getting more favourable policies for Quebec since separating has fallen out of favour in Quebec), and the .5 would be the Green Party. So we can vote against the main 2 without wasting our votes/effectively voting for the party we hate more. BUT the reason I said kinda is notice I said Main 2. NDP has won opposition a few times (2nd most voted for party nationally), but Only 2 parties have ever been the most voted for in an election, the Liberals and the Conservatives. (Bloc Quebecois has won the provincial government multiple times in Quebec, but obviously has never been a contender for national government)

          (Green is .5 because most people know about them, but to my knowledge they have never won even a provincial government, which the other 4 all have multiple times)

          Edit: Guess theres a bunch of Americans pissed that they cant blame how fucked their political system is just on FPTP

          • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            two-party system, political system in which the electorate gives its votes largely to only two major parties and in which one or the other party can win a majority in the legislature.

            Canada is a two party system, because they fit the definition, the majority of the legislature is controlled by the main two parties:

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Commons_of_Canada

            Of the 338 seats, 81% of them are held by either the conservative or liberal party. The other parties have no shot of winning a majority, or taking away any significant number of seats from the big two parties.

            • Kedly@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              9 days ago

              Once again, NDP has won Opposition before (which to those unfamiliar, means that it held more legislative power than all other parties aside from the one that won the election). It is a viable 3rd option and likely would have won the national election roughly a decade ago if Jack Layton hadnt died of cancer during his run.

              And because of how our legislature works, if the winning party wins by a minority (Less than 50% of legislative seats), the NDP can team up with the opposition to outpower the party that won and use that to attempt to get legislation that it wants pushed through as a compromise.

              TL:DR your last paragraph is false and only serves to entrench the 2 most powerful parties. Canadian 3rd parties are VASTLY more viable than American ones

              • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 days ago

                Once again, NDP has won Opposition before

                And the U.S. had the federalist party which once held power. An extra party being previously viable in the past has little to do with whether or not a legislature is controlled by 1 of 2 parties.

                And because of how our legislature works, if the winning party wins by a minority (Less than 50% of legislative seats), the NDP can team up with the opposition to outpower the party that won and use that to attempt to get legislation that it wants pushed through as a compromise.

                “X party can team up with y” also doesn’t negate the definition of a two party system. Cooperation or not, the conservatives and liberals control the overwhelming majority of the seats.

                your last paragraph is false and only serves to entrench the 2 most powerful parties.

                I’ll be honest, I’m not Canadian and rarely speak about Canadian politics. So in no way am I entrenching the two most powerful parties.

                And my last paragraph isn’t false. There are 338 seats in your house of Commons, and 81% of them are held by the two dominant parties. That is objectively true. The final sentence is a subjective one.

                Sure, 3rd parties in Canada fair considerably better than they do in the U.S., but it seems pretty clear that they have no shot of getting a majority.

                So with all of these things together, Canada is a two party system as well, largely due to the use of FPTP voting. We need more representative systems like approval and star voting.

                • Kedly@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  Ah ok, you have zero idea what you are talking about and are projecting American politics onto Canada. Canada has FPTP and Canada is not in anyway a 2 party country. The NDP and Bloc Quebecois have both had a very strong influence on our political landscape and just because our CURRENT government gives souch power to our two most powerful parties doesnt in anyway mean that the NDP gaining significant amount of power is an anomaly, as it has done so many times in the past

  • rsuri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Lots of people have a problem with Trump. All the more reason to want someone opposing him who can beat him.

      • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        9 days ago

        there is 333 milion people in the us. roughly 1/4 of them is of sufficient age and pro-democracy. one of them has to be able to put together coherent sentence.

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        I don’t understand how this is supposed to be like some ‘gotcha’ question. Biden wasn’t a strong candidate in 2016 and lost to Hillary, who then lost to Trump. He wasn’t a strong candidate in 2020 which is why he barely squeaked by Trump to victory. He’s an even worse candidate in 2024 which is why Trump again has a shot at the presidency.

        None of this is new information and the party has has nearly a decade to find a good candidate, yet they keep foisting some of the most unlikable people upon us election afrer election after election. It almost seems as if they’re doing it on purpose at this point. It’s not our fault that they’ve waited until the 11th hour to listen to the complaints and even acknowledge what we’ve all been saying for years. If Biden loses again, maybe stop looking at leftists to blame and start looking at the people in charge of this private organization deciding the fate of us all.

        • Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          9 days ago

          And yet, instead of answering a simple question, you’ve launched into a ‘if only we could change the past’ screed.

          If there was a good answer to the question, people like you would just answer.

          • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 days ago

            That isn’t a “if we could only change the past screed,” it’s calling the party leadership out for allowing things to get to this point. Where in a bus barreling toward the edge of a cliff while the driver has been ignoring our pleas to turn literally any other direction. Now we’re feet from the edge and you want to chastise us for not giving an exact direction earlier and happily plummet over the cliff with the driver.

        • Chainweasel@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          9 days ago

          That’s a long way to go to avoid a question, several paragraphs and you can’t even come up with one name.

          • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            9 days ago

            Fine: Bernie. Happy now that you’ve got a name?

            Fucking Internet lefties and demanding someone have all the answers or they’re not worth listening to

            • AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              9 days ago

              Bernie? The only potential candidate even older than the two in contention?

              • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 days ago

                Did I say he was perfect?

                I simply provided a name when the bad faither’s pretended like that was the essential part of the argument at hand

              • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                9 days ago

                Ignoring the rest of my comment to make me look like I’m demeaning all people on the left and not a specific subset of people who argue in bad faith like yourself?

                Also a classic move by those same people!

              • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                9 days ago

                he is under no obligation to have a name at hand. that is what primaries are for. not having a name at hand doesn’t make biden best possible candidate, or even passable one.

                Ah, there it is.

                fuck off (you are on my blocklist now, don’t bother crafting elaborate answer designed to just piss me off)

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning

      • rsuri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Anybody but Biden. Kamala seems to be the expected replacement, that works. If not her, pretty much anyone else. Trump is a terrible candidate. While he has experience in show business, he’s way past his prime and pretty much any person should be able to beat him in a debate at this point.

        I was actually recently thinking through people I’ve known and whether they could’ve done a better job debating Trump than Biden did. Generally any adult with a functioning mind would do better. Adults I’ve known with a HS education could’ve crushed Trump in that debate. I’m actually not sure if a homeless guy I once debated on the street regarding the meaning of pi would do better or worse than Biden, he seemed to be at about Trump’s level of sanity and if Trump won this last debate, well yeah even he’d do better than Biden. I can also think of some older teenage jocks I once knew, and while they were dumb as rocks their teenager swagger would’ve been more convincing than Biden’s rambling failed attempts to remember rote speeches.

        If I try to think of who is actually about at Biden’s level, I think of myself at the age of 13, when I had a presentation in front of the class on an issue and for some reason I was struck by that early teenager nervousness, and haltingly tried to give a presentation as the class tried failingly to hide their laughter at how terribly it was going. It was probably the most embarrassing day of my life. That’s Biden’s level right there, because he sounded just like me back then giving that presentation. So any person in their late teens or older with a full grasp on sanity should be a much better candidate than Biden.

  • MerrySkeptic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 days ago

    The truth is that Trump has done more for conservative causes than any president prior. He installed the far right justices that have toppled Roe v Wade and affirmative action. He enacted things like the Muslim travel bans. In short, either they know he’s a scumbag and don’t care because he gets results, or they don’t believe their own lyin’ eyes because look at the results he produces. It’s all about the bottom line, and the ends justify the means.

    • kinther@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      I said the same thing the other day. They don’t care. They just want results. It could be a ham sandwich that is starting to mold, and if the ham sandwich got the same results, there would be morons out there wearing ham sandwich hats.

    • skulkingaround@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      For the voters, they really don’t believe it. I have conservative family members. Everything is always “Oh that’s just bullshit cooked up by the crooked Biden crime family” “Oh he didn’t mean the words he said very clearly, what he really meant was blah blah blah” followed ten seconds later by “I like him because he tells it like it is”

      I just don’t get it. What makes this guy seemingly have a force field that can make people deny their own eyes and ears? Ignoring morals here, just thinking with those patterns would give me a cognitive dissonance aneurysm.

      • ZMonster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        9 days ago

        Closeted socialist here. I work in an extremely remote 24/7 process industry. They play Newsmax on the TVs in the chow hall and the only time they don’t is when they are replacing tvs. EVERYONE here is a degree of an alt righter. Some were at J6. Some have “Alex Jones was right” on their thermos’. I honestly believe some would kill me if I said I’ve read Marx. Not a single one of them could accurately define a political, economic, or social system without distracting with tropes, jingoistic rhetoric, or whataboutisms. Academic education is brainwashing. Christianity is a brand-name but you don’t have to read the Bible to be a christian. I made the mistake of expressing my disappointment of Trump because of what he has said about veterans. I was mocked for believing propaganda and over time I have become known as “the liberal”. That was all it took.

        It’s frustrating, and I daily struggle with unchecked bigotry. But most people here do not wake up and choose to be racist or evil. They are doing what their wildly misled moral compass is telling them to be righteous. In their eyes, the pandering of the media that we see is absolute and total corruption to them. The media does lie, they have lied. Most of them couch it In ignorance and a whispered redaction, but that’s all it took. If they can lie about anything, then they must be lying about the unflattering things. There’s a bit of head-in-the-sand and delusion, but in their eyes the rape, the lawsuits, the theft from taxpayers, all of it is exactly what they would say if they were trying to make him look bad. That’s enough for them.

        I honestly don’t blame them. They have fallen for grifts, lies, and propaganda that goes back at least 200 years.

        • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          I used to work at a place where an entire department was like that. They’d always have Jordan Peterson’s latest talk/show/podcast on in the background, MAGA merch, etc. They’d always have the facial expression of an inmate mugshot. And they’d always be super short with people. One of them made a point of saying the N word as much as they could.

          Any time I had to interact with them I’d dread it. I can only imagine how terribly it would have gone if I had dared say anything political in earshot of them.

        • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          Critical Support for ZMonster. I also have to suffer ignorance with MAGA friends and family. Stay safe.

          • ZMonster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 days ago

            🙏 Good on you. Thanks and same to you. Luckily I used to be petulant and conservative so I can fit in when I need to. And my income is used by my partner to raise a child surrounded by love, understanding, and encouragement. So I feel like I’m filtering a portion of capitalism into raising a little communist. 🤣 It’s enough to keep me gritting through the xenophobia. 😬

            • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              9 days ago

              We saw fireworks last night, and my daughter mentioned, “Is that why your property taxes are so high?” I laughed. Raising class conscious kids is fun . 🤩

        • arefx@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          at the end of the day they are idiots who fell for a grift as old as time.

          • ZMonster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 days ago

            I think this type of thinking is just as toxic as the thinking of the ones you so quickly call “idiots”. Not only do you fail to affect the situation in any positive way, but you harden the commitment of those that fell for the grift. Furthermore, you’re blatantly wrong. I’m sure there are things you are ignorant about. I’m positive I could find things that you think that I could demonstrate to be wildly inaccurate (mostly because I work in a very niche field that very few people do). None of them would make you an idiot. It’s okay to not know something. I’m not saying you should pander to anyone, but patience is a balm. Have some.

            • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 days ago

              I feel ya. I didn’t talk to my mom for 2 months after she voted for Trump. This, after 4 years of me detailing his actions. Then I realized that it’s not their fault. They were never given the tools to navigate politics with education. The media lies to them. And their social circles repeat these lies. I was once just like them.

              • ZMonster@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 days ago

                No doubt. Every friend I have is a trumper, but my best friend believes in the cabal. It’s tough and it’s heartbreaking. But I decided I’m just going to be an example of tolerance if nothing else.

                • arefx@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 days ago

                  No, you’re just making a generalization of me based off one opinion I have that you disagree with.