• Ragdoll X@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I bet OP’s understanding of politics can be succinctly summarized by this video lol

    Like in what world does lemmy.world lean to the right? It’s full of leftists and liberals, I think I’ve seen like two people who sounded like they leaned to the right.

    • Dodecahedron December@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      “I went to the instance and read a post and it was right wing so they are right wing”

      TIL i am right wing because I have an account on lemmy.world. now that’s scyense!

      • Fosheze@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think lemmy.world is just labeled slightly rightwing because of blocking the piracy communities.

        • Dodecahedron December@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You might be right but that’s a weird stance to take.

          I just wish everyone understood that hosting a website that lets thousands of anonymous people talk and post whatever they want can be anxiety-provoking. Imagine waking up and the front page of the site you own is hosting CSAM or being served a legal document that you’re now being sued by CompanyX over hosting of pirated content.

          The dark web, p2p networks, bittorrent etc all exist to fly somewhat under the radar, and they seem to be less closely regulated because they require a certain level of experience to even use. The web and apps in the app store on the other hand are easily accessible with a few clicks or taps and not much knowledge. I’ll just say that I’ve worked as a web developer for different companies and whenever we had “DCMA takedown requests” we usually had one of the higher-ups walk over to our desk and waited until they knew all copies of those files were completely removed from their servers. I’m just talking about things like breaking embargo and showing images of a product before it’s been released, not piracy or CSAM. Now figure the instance owners likely don’t have a legal team of their own, so even the threat of a lawsuit means no more instance for everyone.

          Nothing right or left wing about that. People don’t like getting sued and having to lose everything.

          • Fosheze@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The thing is that those communities weren’t distributing pirated content. The were discussing priacy which is perfectly legal no mater how you stretch the law. Also the legal argument is bogus anyways considering division by zero, the instance that hosts that priacy community and sever others like it, is hosted in Germany which is among the countries with the harshest anti-piracy laws. It’s not like it’s some back alley dark web instance. If they were doing anything remotely illegal piracy wise the German government would have shut them down immediately. The only real reason for blocking those communities is a moral one and the anti piracy moral stance does strike me as slightly auth-right.

            • Dodecahedron December@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The difference between what you described and what I described is moderation and rules. It’s just risk and risk level that the volunteers who run the instance are willing to put up with.

              Have you considered creating your own instance? If you aren’t in the US this might be easier for you to take on this risk than say US admins.

              And if blocking is the concern, just get an account on the priacy instance! Easy peasy.