I’m interested to see what lemmy thinks of this, I honestly haven’t kept track of the potential options.

  • Ledivin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I like Buttigieg the most, but I don’t think he has enough time to be built up for this election. I’d be excited to see him as a VP ticket, or for next election.

    I think that Kamala is our best choice, but I worry that our country isn’t ready to vote in a female president. We’re still so ridiculously misogynistic that it would be comical if it wasn’t such a fucking travesty

    • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      I would disagree. The only reason the last woman to run for president failed was because she was Hillary Clinton. If she’d have been virtually anyone else, she’d probably have won.

    • Andy@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Pete needs to go mayor some more. He had a few good ideas during the primary, but as Transportation Secretary I’m astounded at his lack of ambition.

      There are a handful of administration officials – Lina Khan first among them – who’ve learned to use their power assertively to make changes to broken systems. And Pete… he seems like he just pops up when another piece of infrastructure breaks to let us know that he’s on it. Maybe he’s doing something more, but if so he’s doing it very, very quietly.

      • batmaniam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        This was sort of my impression to. Like I loosely liked him, but couldn’t really tell you what he’s directly responsible for. Which isn’t a bad thing on its own and doesn’t mean he wasnt doing a good job, just that I don’t know much about him.

      • sunzu@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Bro… Lina got put in place to show that feds are “trying”

        The judiciary is clearly not impressed.

        Wall Street Pete is there to cover up railroad accidents and Boeing bullshit. I don’t think he even has good intentions, just management consulting zombie being put in place to do corruption for the elites.

        • Andy@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          If I can be frank, I’m reading from your tone that you’re not here for polite, factual persuasion. But if I’m wrong, or someone else sees this, I gotta drop a fact check on the ‘Lina can’t win cases’ myth:

          https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/out-with-a-bang-as-ftc-beats-the

          More practically, this loss discredits the main argument from Wall Street. Dealmakers, and thinkers like Larry Summers, have often said that while Biden antitrust enforcers are aggressive, if corporations are willing to go to court, the government is likely to lose because judges won’t let them rewrite the law. This narrative was so strong that Lina Khan and Jonathan Kanter were questioned in Congress as to whether they were even trying to win. It’s always been a narrow and bad faith critique, but this victory, plus, the win in the Fifth Circuit over Illumina, should put that narrative to rest. Antitrust lawyers will tell their clients to go to court at their peril.

          It’s kind of a deep dive, but it’s worth it.

          • sunzu@kbin.run
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            This issue won’t be solved via executive agency.

            It requires an act of congress since the current regulatory regime is broken.

            She just got put in place for act like feds are doing something. It is a circle jerk.

            I get that y’all spinning anything you can latch on as a W for the Democrats such as people are making more money under biden … lol

            If you think that limp dick FTC has the power or the legal underpinning to regulate mega corps in 2024… Have fun!

            • Andy@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              You know, for a guy with the username “Sunzu”, I feel like you’re demonstrating a remarkable lack of vision of power dynamics.

              First, I’m not a Democrat. I’m not invested in holding up that party.

              Again, I’m talking more to any audience than you in particular: when someone says that any attempt to use power creatively is a waste of time, I think that is either ignorant or in bad faith. The SIZE of any given effect or the use of resources in one place or another can be certainly debated, but the logic of the revitalized antitrust movement is very, very sound. Power has been left unused, and now people like Khan and Jonathan Kantor are learning how to use it again, and showing others.

              The logic you’re outlining runs in contradiction to what we might call “The Bork consensus”. A lot of the issues we face WERE developed through regulatory capture rather than legislation, led by Robert Bork under Reagan. If you don’t want to use that power for anything, feel free, but I’m going to evangelize using every tool available. And these are pretty big ones.

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    5 months ago

    Quick question, serious question…can we make Zelenskyy a dual citizen, dual president? I’d be good with that.

    • Iceblade@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      5 months ago

      One presidency is more than a full-time job. Whilst I do like him cut the poor guy some slack.

    • radix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Article II, Section 1, Clause 5:

      No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

      Even if he were a natural born citizen, he’d have to live in the US for 14 years first to be eligible.

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        We could us the Republican style of argument that “years” had a different meaning in the founding father’s era as people died a lot sooner. Therefore “a year” was only the length of what we call “a day” now.

    • Eylrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Dude’s got more than enough on his plate, but maybe we could find an American comedian who plays piano with his dick

  • FireTower@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think Cory Booker has potential. But a ham sandwich is the most electable candidate today. Just be somewhat alive and not problematic.

  • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    63
    ·
    5 months ago

    The duopoly choice is Bernie Sanders, even though he betrayed his movement and the people that helped fund and grow his grassroots campaign.

    A non-duopoly choice is a 3rd Party candidate, Jill Stien, Green Party.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think Bernie’s earned it though. He may be old, but he’s still mentally intact. Trump was never mentally intact, and Biden…well…yeah. Biden kinda fell off his rocker. Good man. I wish him all the best, and hope he gets the care he needs. However, we don’t really need someone who talks about how we defeated health care running our health care.

        I may hate Trump, but he did have one line that I think sealed the deal for Biden. He said “I don’t know what he said, I don’t think he knows what he said”, and everybody just kind of saddly nodded their head, because it was true.

        But Bernie will be a firecracker up your ass fighting the good fight for every American. And unlike a lot of these politicians, he’s not a phoney. Harris can say that she’s changed, and she now stands to legalize marijuanna, and all this other stuff…but she has a track record. Bernie has a track record too, except he HASN’T changed. There’s photos of him in the 60s getting arrested fighting for civil rights. I’d rather he be president than a younger person who may or may not be who they say they are. Plus I like his policies.

        • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’m right there with you. Bernie totally could have won the general in 2016, and we’d be in a hell of a lot better place now, but he didn’t, and sadly that time has passed.

        • Eylrid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          [Bernie] may be old, but he’s still mentally intact.

          At that age mental acuity can go fast. I would vote for Bernie over Trump or Biden in a heartbeat, but I would rather have someone younger.

        • qprimed@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          with a receptive white house, Bernie will be a firecracker anywhere. I would be more than happy for Bernie to retain his Senate seat and get the committee assignments that give him maximal internal clout.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      A non-duopoly choice is a 3rd Party candidate, Jill Stien, Green Party.

      Reading her platform, I’d say it’s a no go for me.

      Two bullet points back to back are “Have the UN Security Council hold Israel accountable” and at the same time “end the UN Security Council”. So which is it, use the UNSC to hold Israel accountable or the UNSC is a bad thing?

      Also on her platform, disband NATO and stop giving Ukraine aid. If we do this, then Ukraine and Russia will just hug it out and everyone will be happy. A few unrealistic things like this where it’s way too optimistic and paves the way for things to go horribly wrong.

      Then there are the good intentions, but bad consequences ideas. Pay reparations to third world countries for climate. Historically, “just dump money and resources” has been tried and you just give those to regional warlords that will make things worse. Need a more thought out engagement plan than that.

      Broadly some decent domestic policy goals, but pretty impractical foreign policy ideas.

      • CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        5 months ago

        The anti Bernie propaganda is scared of people rallying around him since Bidens departure

        Theres no real replyabout his “betrayal”

        • qprimed@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          yeah, and everyone knew exactly which accounts they would be.

      • Andy@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        While I don’t traffic in such forceful language, I can answer what @criitz means:

        Bernie Sanders raised millions of dollars on the promise to lead a political revolution. For many supporters, that proposition was taken literally. They thought that his campaign was not simply a vehicle to give him the power of the presidency, but was the organizing structure for a persistent movement of activists reengaging with democracy each and every week BETWEEN elections. And when he dropped out, a lot of those people lost their connections to social and organizing structures that were giving them hope and an outlet for meeting like-minded people to find ways to make their communities better. So when he ended his campaign and all that money and infrastructure got instantly packed up and taken away, they felt like they’d been misled.

        Some found their way into activism through the DSA or climate groups, but for many, the way in which he disbanded his campaign without following through on the implied promise to transform it into something durable was a very unexpected and painful surprise.

        • criitz@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          I see, thank you for explaining. I believe Bernie has done pretty much everything he could for decades, but I get how people may have felt misled. It can be very disheartening to try and enact real change in this country.

        • kobra@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          i hadn’t heard this angle articulated before, thanks for sharing.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’d vote for Bernie Sanders because he has a podcast. Any politician that seeks out long conversations is a winner in my book.

  • AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    5 months ago

    Mao Zedong and Vladimir Lenin have said some positive things about workers’ rights. The others are too far right and would be considered conservatives in other countries.

  • toomanypancakes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Maria Branyas.

    I think age is important, and Biden just didn’t have the necessary life experience to be a successful candidate 😉

  • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    How about Mayor Joseph Fitzgerald O’Malley Fitzpatrick O’Donnell The Edge “Joe” Quimby?

    Seems like a great pick for the role /s

  • Zonefive@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    Secretary (Mayor) Pete Boot-Edge-Edge. Can’t wait to vote for the guy now and/or in the future.