• roboto@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    You do not seem to understand how peer review let alone scientific research works and what kind of rigor is required to get your research published in an A* journal and I’ll leave it at that.

    • Snowflake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      When journalists and peer-review get a more accurate number of deaths than… The Gaza health ministry ran by the government of Gaza.

      Okay.

      I said it before. Why don’t we just say 500 thousand dead why be so conservative? Why don’t we even say it’s a million dead!

      • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Because that’s… not the estimate that the most accurate process they can come up with leads to?

        This sorta reminds me of conversations I’ve had with Trump supporters, where the very idea that you could evaluate a source and one could be more believable than another for reasons other than ideology, (like that one is trying to get the truth and one isn’t), is alien to them.

          • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah… and the health ministry has been unable to update their stuff due to being bombed out… do you even listen to yourself?

            • Snowflake@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              They literally released an updated death count today. 39,653 as of today.

              What are you talking about “unable to update stuff due to being bombed out”? Literally. You make things up.

        • roboto@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          I mean this person has absolutely no idea what they’re talking about if they think journalists publish in The Lancet just because it’s called a journal so I think any discussion is absolutely pointless.

      • roboto@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Journalists publishing in the lancet and doing peer review? I rest my case.