I know MediaBiasFactCheck is not a be-all-end-all to truth/bias in media, but I find it to be a useful resource.

It makes sense to downvote it in posts that have great discussion – let the content rise up so people can have discussions with humans, sure.

But sometimes I see it getting downvoted when it’s the only comment there. Which does nothing, unless a reader has rules that automatically hide downvoted comments (but a reader would be able to expand the comment anyways…so really no difference).

What’s the point of downvoting? My only guess is that there’s people who are salty about something it said about some source they like. Yet I don’t see anyone providing an alternative to MediaBiasFactCheck…

          • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I may be thinking of a different bot then.

            Hmmm, nope, I checked my block list and that’s the right account name. I’m 100% sure that I blocked it more than 11 days ago though.

            • Pika@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              concidering the bot has a creation date listed on its profile as 7-28-24, it can’t be too long ago that you did, I’m not sure what you saw.

              Screenshot_20240809_014613_Firefox Nightly

      • FarFarAway@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        The posts are 4 lines but when each comment includes 3 or 4 sources it checks, you end up with a giant block of spoiler text that usually takes up about a full screen (Sometimes less, sometimes more)

        • DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          That comment you linked is displayed as four lines, and it only gets long if you expand everything.
          I can get being upset with the corporation itself or the methodology is uses.
          But if you don’t interact with the spoiler tags,
          it’s as long as this comment.

          • FarFarAway@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            This is what i see on connect. Maybe its the app, but I’m sure its there’s more people who see this and think its an eyesore.

            Edit: yes each article is only 4 lines, but theres 3 entries.

            • DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              That’s the app you use failing at displaying text, on a website that is mostly text.

              You should submit a ticket to the dev, or use an app that’s out of beta.