A lot of what needs to be done is making sure that the Harris win is large enough that you can’t easily claim that a handful of ballots should be tossed and change the outcome. That means:

  • Check your voter registration — part of the Republican strategy has long been invalidating registrations so people can’t vote
  • Volunteer — nothing in the world quite like talking to people.
  • Donate — money is used for everything from ads to voter turnout operations
  • Organize; be prepared to turn out with others in your community to actively object to any effort to ignore your votes
    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes but there was no internet or helicopters back then. That spat that took 50 years for scholars to figure out would flash right in front of everyone just like Jan 6.

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          1 month ago

          No Congress-persons were in danger, ever. The only danger was to law enforcement and those rioting. Even if they had truly and utterly taken control of the Capitol building, Congress would have continued on with the counting elsewhere.

          I really think you’re overestimating the likelihood of this sort of thing happening. It is not the 18th century and the US is not an undeveloped place with weak institutional systems.

          • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            The Republican party has been making a real effort to weaken institutions and things came remarkably close to killing members of congress. They literally had a gallows outside and gave interviews saying how they planned to hang people.

            • stoly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Yes of course they are making those efforts and saying those things. I’m suggesting that they are disorganized and stupid so the likelihood if success is infinitesimally small.

              Also the US capitol has been attacked in the past. They have had escape systems in place for ages, especially from during the Cold War. There are so many resiliency and fallback plans. Congress can just pick up and continue in a secure location if they have to.

              • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 month ago

                I think they’ve learned from past disorganization, and are likely to be a lot better next time.

          • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            It is not the 18th century and the US is not an undeveloped place with weak institutional systems.

            Nobody thought that a mob of people could barge into the Capitol Building, either, and yet it did. Our institutional systems have exploitable flaws, like all do. You have to do the tedious work of bulletproofing your systems based on hypotheticals (“What if somebody did this?”) as well as fixing flaws after exploitation actually occurs.

            “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” is stupid. It’s much, much harder to fix something after it’s broken.

            • stoly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              This isn’t an if it ain’t broke moment. I really do think people overestimate what these people are capable of doing. Yea they can spend an afternoon having a temper tantrum but can they really change a government, which would require a sustained attack against a professional military?l

              • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                Yea they can spend an afternoon having a temper tantrum but can they really change a government, which would require a sustained attack against a professional military?l

                Why would the military be involved in certifying an election?

                • stoly@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  In protecting from any real attempt to take control through physical means. Forcing Congress to relocate would be egregious but it wouldn’t stop Congress from functioning.