It is against the rules but but what is it exactly?

    • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      I usually just ask them to back that assertion up by running “pacman -Rcs xwayland” (or their package manager’s equivalent).

      None have taken me up on my request, and they immediately switch to blaming the apps for it, even though some literally cannot be ported.

    • bruhduh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Agree with you homie, even more so, some people deadass saying that arch is stable and good for windows refugees

        • maniii@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          For some of us, X11/Xorg is better , way way better than using Wayland.

          Linux means we should have a choice without sacrificing our freedom. So if I want to use X11/Xorg or Wayland, I SHOULD MAKE THAT DECISION.

          Looking at the garbage trash fire that is systemd.

          Only way I can get SysVInit back is if I use Slackware, Devuan , so a complete switch of distro and tools. No choice no freedom.

          • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Dilettante here. How hard or easy is it to switch back and forth between X11 and Wayland?

            • maniii@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              No idea as I have Wayland disabled from install. Wayland packages based on distros are probably compatible with X11/Xorg packages installed side-by-side. Choose whichever suits your needs. If you like Wayland or X it will be your choice.