• BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    24 days ago

    Ninja Assassin. Okay, not a great film but it made a profit in the box office, the fight scenes were pretty sick, and it hinted at a little bit of world building with the mention of other clans.

    • ___@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      Yeah, would have been nice to find out what happened after Neo flew away. At least Rage was playing.

      • RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        22 days ago

        But seriously: it was a perfect ending. Now he’s Superman, kicks everyone’s ass, frees mankind. The sequels were not only shit but completely unnecessary.

        • Tracked@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          23 days ago

          I know it’s a joke. But is bad, especially since those movies were great and made money.

          • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            22 days ago

            “Great” is a massive overstatement. They were passable movies that suffered from bad pacing and exposition dumping. I don’t hate reloaded or revolutions, but I’m not going to go out of my way to watch them like I do for the first one.

          • androogee (they/she)@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            23 days ago

            Matrix sequels underrated crew rise up!

            Say what you will about the Wachowskis, they never fail to push boundaries and try something weird and interesting with every film.

            I’m very glad that the people who don’t appreciate that haven’t stopped them from doing what they do. What a bunch of wet blankets.

      • smackjack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        The biggest problem with those two movies is that the pacing was awful. You had exhausting fight and chase scenes followed by scenes that had way too much mumbo jumbo dialogue. Every scene could have been made shorter without losing any plot points.

        • Tracked@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          23 days ago

          Is only mumbo jumbo if you don’t understand them. I got them just fine. And the action scenes were groundbreaking, nobody else tried something like that before in Hollywood movies, it was a delight to see

          • BigPotato@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            23 days ago

            I understood them all just fine… Still poor pacing. The first movie was basically half buildup for the second half’s continuous action. Two and three both suffered from the abrupt slow down after the action scenes that I personally feel never really got “better.”

            I mean, I’ve got them all so I’m not going to pretend they’re as bad as other movies that we pretend didn’t get sequels but they just worse than the first one.

            That said, I would regularly rewatch a cut that was just all the action scenes.

    • astrsk@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      I might be in the minority but Chappie was a really good movie. It’s a real bummer Die Antword were so horrible to work with that the director kinda gave up on it.

      • roofuskit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        23 days ago

        Yeah, but before the director made several more movies that were all bad. I don’t know how he keeps getting work.

          • BigPotato@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            23 days ago

            I mean, stupid teenage boys will spend what money they have to hang out with their friends… So, it’s a viable audience.

          • herrvogel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            23 days ago

            His stuff at least manages to make money somehow, so that makes some kind of sense from a money worship point of view. I doubt Blomkamp’s movies raked in as much cash though.

          • roofuskit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            23 days ago

            Yeah, that’s another that makes no sense to me. People largely dislike all his recent works. “Let’s give him a huge budget for a two part star wars fan fic!”

            • MagicShel@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              23 days ago

              Snyder has an amazing eye for action. Sucker Punch, 300, and Watchmen were all amazing visual/auditory feasts. Everything else about his movies is just average to below average, though.

              Giving him a Star Wars makes perfect sense when you consider what Disney thinks of the Star Wars audience. “Just give them laser sword and space ships and explosions and they’ll be happy.”

              • Illuminostro@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                23 days ago

                Blomkamp is better in every way. I think he got blacklisted because the money guys didn’t like his social commentary.

                • roofuskit@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  Blokamp is great at effects and story ideas, he’s not a good director. Even District 9 is a bit of a directorial mess but there’s enough interesting story there to overcome that. The rest of his films? Not so much.

                • MagicShel@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  23 days ago

                  I personally wouldn’t put him above Snyder in the visuals category, but I respect your opinion and I don’t think you’re way off or anything. I can see having that preference.

  • ZeroTwo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    22 days ago

    The cabin in the woods. I’d love to see other groups trigger other monsters or a prequel on how they captured all the monsters.

        • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 days ago

          Yea, there is a cameo in the movie though. During the scene where they’re showing all the monsters in boxes you can briefly see a boomer and a tank.

  • Yprum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    I can’t see anyone mentioning Titan A.E. man I love that movie, the mix of hand drawn animation and CGI was great for the time and I really enjoyed the world building.

  • 7uWqKj@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    23 days ago

    Return of the Jedi. Episode 7 is not a sequel but a remake. Episodes 8 and 9 are bullshit.

    • Gaspar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      23 days ago

      I mean, if we’re talking release order, then Return of the Jedi did get a sequel! It was called The Phantom Menace and ahh

      Ahahaha hahahahahahahaha. I’m sorry, I’m sorry! I almost made it through with a straight face.

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    24 days ago

    Warcraft

    Like the video game. It was actually a pretty good introduction to the lore, (which I only know surface level from playing the games and not digging real deep. So there may have been mistakes) and it was just about to get good, but, there just wasn’t enough interest to sink more money in the franchise.

    • TehBamski@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      I saw Warcraft in theaters when it came out. I left the theater thinking that it was 6/10 at best.

      Fast forward to 2021. I Saw that it had gotten better reviews since years ago, and I was thirsty for some nostalgia and was willing to give it another try. Turns out, I liked it more this time around. I believe that I had my expectations really high when I went to see it. Seconded watch, I gave it a 7.5/10.

      • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 days ago

        I really liked how neither the Orcs or Humans were the bad guys. They painted both teams as equally sympathetic.

        When we were following the Humans I was like “Yeah! Let’s crush those Orcs!” But then we start following the Orcs and I’m like “Watch out! Those asshole Humans are coming for you!”

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 days ago

      I think going back to warcraft 1 was ultimately a mistake. If they did a part closer to where the wow story was it would have done better.

      • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 days ago

        I thought the exact same thing after I watched it. Sadly, that same thought made me especially excited for the sequel… that never came.

        I understand why they did it, but there’s just too much to absorb. I was a fan, and although I recognized some of the names, I wasn’t familiar with any of the characters besides Gul’dan.

        The entire first movie should have been a 5-10 minute exposition. “It’s been X years since we came through the portal…” And instead we follow Thrall and Grom, and Uther while two factions battle for dominance! (and it’s been a while, so I forget what all happens in Warcraft 2)

        Now that I’ve typed it all out, I’ve decided that if they could only make one Warcraft movie, but I got to pick which era, it would definitely be Arthas and the Lich King. That’s a good story.

    • ultranaut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      I recently watched this and was surprised how much I enjoyed it, I expected it to be terrible based on the reviews.

    • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 days ago

      I never played wow and thought the movie was pretty good. Especially for a video game adaptation

    • kratoz29@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      I find this comment reassuring as I have said movie on my watchlist.

      (My Warcraft knowledge is about almost finishing Warcraft III, for some reason I always leave it close at the end, or at least I think I am close.)

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          It became a parody of Godzilla movies for no real reason. And it came out of nowhere. I call it the movies 4th act.

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          24 days ago

          …uhhhhhhh, I would ask your mom if she smoked while pregnant with you. There’s clearly something wrong with the development of how your brain came out.

          • PoopingCough@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            24 days ago

            Look, I’m not saying any of them come close to the original, but imo it’s the second best of the series (including all the dogshit jurassic worlds) because it sticks to what made the first one great; small amount of people trapped on an island with dinos. The Lost World was like half that but then it turns in to some weird almost king kong-esq thing. Also i love me some Goldblum but he’s better as a foil imo and Chris Pratt has nowhere near the gravitas as Sam Neil. Like really besides the annoying parents what do you not like about the third one?

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        Jurassic World is a guilty pleasure of mine.
        It’s good enough to grip you and at the same time so predictable and full of clichés it’s also funny.
        Plus, Chris Pratt and Bryce Dallas Howard are both hot as hell.

    • Tracked@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      23 days ago

      What’s up with denying the trilogy? The shitty PC era movie I get it. But the sequels were excellent, the symbolism and how smith is defeated it’s brilliant. I bet you wanted a copy of the first movie.

      • Yprum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        The thing is that “excellent” is something they are not… Look I enjoyed the movies too, they can be quite fun. Some aspects are great, the action and stunt work is in my opinion flawless for the time. Some other things were great too and some others not so much. But in general, really they are not good movies if we try to be a bit neutral, and at the very least they can’t follow the complexity of the theme from the first movie while making it look so simple like that one did. It may just be the case of standing too close to the sun, the movies as part of the trilogy just can’t compare. So people have a feeling of rejection to them. And probably the one thing people find it tough to come to grips with is the fact that the first movie had great action, that helped the movie go forward, while the others just seem to have random action scenes that are just not part of the story. It’s just about how they are added into the story.

        But don’t let that bother you, enjoy the movies, I still do, they are just not the masterpieces the first one was.

        And no, its not about wanting the first one again, in essence, I wish the movies would have managed to expand the story in a refreshing way like the Animatrix did. But they just fall flat instead, simple mindless fun that kinda finish the storyline quite OK for me.

        Now the fourth part… That was brilliant, a brilliant crap, but brilliant nonetheless. If my guess is not wrong, it was a great middle finger to the movie execs that wanted to squeeze more money out of the movies.

      • lugal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        You call it a trilogy because you reject the fourth one

        I call it trilogy because I reject the first one

        We are not the same

        Jokes aside, I would call 2&3 a long movie, which makes it a trilogy again. One mistake is to see them as separate

    • Wanderer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      I really don’t get the hate for the second two.

      There was a bit more to the story and required paying attention. The second two had more action that’s wasn’t directly related to the story but was still good.

      As much as I tried to like 4 it was crap.

  • son_named_bort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    23 days ago

    Beetlejuice. It was such a popular movie that spawned a musical, a cartoon, various video games, etc yet there’s only been the one movie. There’s been talks about a sequel over the years but nothing has materialized yet.

  • Hubbubbub@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    Master and Commander. It was such a great adaptation of a hugely popular series, I expected it to do better at the box office than it did.

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      24 days ago

      I would have loved a sequel, too. That movie would probably have done better if it had not have to compete to The Return of the King that year.

    • azimir@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      24 days ago

      It’s a phenomenal movie with lots of actually reasonable depictions of sailing in the era.

    • Demonmariner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      23 days ago

      It was a great try, visually stunning and true to the overall feel of the book, but it didn’t have a very cohesive story. They tried to cover too much ground. It would have been better if they had just stuck to the first book.