• utopiah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      there isn’t a single serious project written exclusively or mostly by an LLM? There isn’t a single library or remotely original application

      IMHO “original” here is the key. Finding yet another clone of a Web framework ported from one language to another in order to push online a basic CMS slightly faster, I can imagine this. In fact I even bet that LLM, because they manipulate words in languages and that code can be safely (even thought not cheaply) tested within containers, could be an interesting solution for that.

      … but that is NOT really creating value for anyone, unless that person is technically very savvy and thus able to leverage why a framework in a language over another creates new opportunities (say safety, performances, etc). So… for somebody who is not that savvy, “just” relying on the numerous existing already existing open-source providing exactly the value they expect, there is no incentive to re-invent.

      For anything that is genuinely original, i.e something that is not a port to another architecture, a translation to another language, a slight optimization, but rather something that need just a bit of reasoning and evaluating against the value created, I’m very skeptical, even less so while pouring less resources EVEN with a radical drop in costs.

    • Hawk@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      My last employer had many internal tools that were fine.

      They had only a moderate amount of oversight.

      I had to find a new job, I’m actually thinking of walking away from software development now that there are so few jobs :(

      It sucks but there’s no sense pretending this won’t have a large impact on the job landscape.

        • Hawk@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Mostly internal data cleaning stuff, close etc, which I accept is less in scope than you’re original comment.

          • jeeva@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            The things you are describing sound like if-statement levels of automation, GitHub Actions with preprogrammed responses rather than LLM whatever.

            If you’re worrying about being replaced by that… Go find the code, read it, and feel better.

            • Hawk@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              The code was non trivial and relatively sophisticated. It performed statistical analysis on ingested data and the approach taken was statistically sound.

              I was replaced by that. So was my colleague.

              The job market is exceptionally tough right now and a large part of that is certainly llms.

              I think taking people with statistical training out of the equation is quite dangerous, but it’s happening. In my area, everybody doing applied mathematics, statistics or analysis has been laid off.

              In saying that, the produced program was quite good.

              • jeeva@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Certainly sounds more interesting than my original read of it! Sorry about that, I was grumpy.

                • Hawk@lemmynsfw.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  All good man.

                  I think the point is that LLMs can replace people and they are quite good.

                  But they absolutely shouldn’t replace people, yet, or possibly ever.

                  But that’s what’s happening and it’s a massive problem because it’s leading to mediocre code in important spaces.

    • woodgen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      Lets wait for any LLM do a single sucessful MR on Github first before starting a project on its own. Not aware of any.

  • linearchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    2 months ago

    Guys that are putting billions of dollars into their AI companies making grand claims about AI replacing everyone in two years. Whoda thunk it

  • SomeGuy69@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    But coding never was the difficult part. It’s understanding a concept, identify a problem and solve it with the possible methods. An AI just makes the coding part faster and gives me options to quicker identify a possible solution. Thankfully there’s a never ending pile of projects, issues, todos and stackholder wants, that I don’t see how we need less programmers. Maybe we need more to deal with AI, as now people can do a lot more in house instead of outsourcing, but as soon as that threshold is reached, companies will again contact large software companies. If people want to put AI into everything, you need people feeding the AI with company specific data and instruct people to use this AI.

    All I see is middle management getting replaced, because instead of a boring meeting, I could just ask an AI.

    • curry@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I dread meetings and I can’t wait for AIs to replace those managers. Or perhaps we’ll have even more meetings because the management wants to know why we’re so late despite the AI happily churning out meaningless codes that look so awesome like all that CSI VB GUI crap.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s been said before but the whiter your collar the more likely you are to be replaced by AI simply because the grunts tend to do more varied less pleibeon things.

      Middle managers tend to write a lot of documents and emails which is something AI excels at. The programmers meanwhile have to come up with creative solutions to problems, and AI is less good at being creative, it basically just copy pastes known solutions from the web.

      • Liam Mayfair@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Realises devs have always joked about their jobs just being about copy-pasting solutions from StackOverflow 80% of the time

        Oh God…

  • qarbone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    2 months ago

    If, 24 months from now, most people aren’t coding, it’ll be because people like him cut jobs to make a quicker buck. Or nickel.

    • Cringe2793@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Well if it works, means that job wasn’t that important, and the people doing that job should improve themselves to stay relevant.

      Edit: wow what a bunch of hypersensitive babies. I swear, y’all just allergic to learning or something. I just said people need to improve themselves to stay relevant, and people freak out and send me death threats. What a joke.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        job wasn’t that important

        I keep telling you that changing out the battery in the smoke alarm isn’t worth the effort and you keep telling me that the house is currently on fire, we need to get out of here immediately, and I just roll my eyes because you’re only proving my point.

        • Cringe2793@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          25
          ·
          2 months ago

          Sure, believe what you want to believe. You can either adapt to what’s happening, or just get phased out. AI is happening whether you like it or not. You may as well learn to use it.

          • TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            You can adapt, but how you adapt matters.

            AI in tech companies is like a hammer or drill. You can either get rid of your entire construction staff and replace them with a few hammers, or you can keep your staff and give each worker a hammer. In the first scenario, nothing gets done, yet jobs are replaced. In the second scenario, people keep their jobs, their jobs are easier, and the house gets built.

            • Cringe2793@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Yup. Most of us aren’t CEOs, so we don’t have a lot of say about how most companies are run. All we can do is improve ourselves.

              For some reason, a lot of people seem to be against that. They prefer to whine.

      • qarbone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        Define “works”?

        If you’re a CEO, cutting all your talent, enshittifying your product, and pocketing the difference in new, lower costs vs standard profits might be considered as “working”.

        • Cringe2793@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          2 months ago

          Hmmm maybe you’re misunderstanding me.

          What I mean is “coding” is basically the grunt work of development. The real skill is understanding the requirements and building something efficiently. Tbh, I hate coding.

          What tools like Gemini or ChatGPT brings to the table is the ability to create small, efficient snippets of code that works. We can then just modify it to meet our more specific requirements.

          This makes things much faster, for me at least. If the time comes when the AI can generate more efficient code, making my job easier, I’d count that as “works” for me.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Define “works.”

        Because the goals of a money-hungry CEO don’t always align with those of the workers in the company itself (or often, even the consumer). I imagine this guy will think it worked just fine as he’s enjoying his golden parachute.

    • Zess@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      They think it will be easier than having people write the code from scratch. I don’t know shit about coding but I know that’s definitely not right.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        2 months ago

        AI is quite good at writing small sections of code. Usually because it’s more or less just copying something off the internet that it’s found, maybe changing a few bits around, but essentially just regurgitating something that’s in its data set. I could of course just have done that but it saves time since the AI can find the relevant piece of code to copy and modify more or less instantly.

        But it falls apart if you ask it to build entire applications. You can barely even get it to write pong without a lot of tinkering around after the fact which rather defeats the point really.

        It also doesn’t deal well if the thing you’re trying to program for is not very well documented, which would include things like drivers, which presumably is their bread and butter.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          That might actually be a good test for managers who think coders can be replaced by this. Have them try to make a working version of Pong using AI prompts.

    • Chais@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      Really simple. Just ask it to point out the error. Also maybe tell it how the code is wrong. And then hope that the new code didn’t introduce new errors in formerly working sections. And that it understood what you meant. In a language that is inherently vague.

  • yokonzo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    How many times does the public have to learn if the CEO says it, he probably doesn’t know what he’s talking about. If the devs say it, listen

  • Fosheze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    2 months ago

    A company I used to work for outsourced most of their coding to a company in India. I say most because when the code came back the internal teams anways had to put a bunch of work in to fix it and integrate it with existing systems. I imagine that, if anything, LLMs will just take the place of that overseas coding farm. The code they spit out will still need to be fixed and modified so it works with your existing systems and that work is going to require programmers.

    • ammonium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 months ago

      So instead of spending 1 day writing good code, we’ll be spending a week debugging shitty code. Great.

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    They aren’t wrong, just late. Coding is already dead. Most coders I know spend very little time writing new code. Meeting/discussions about requirements, debugging, fighting with pipelines or tests. I once read that a good programmer writes 10 to 100 lines of fully functional, tested, working, and meeting the actual need code a day. I believe it.

    • Zacryon@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Coding is already dead. Most coders I know spend very little time writing new code.

      Oh no, I should probably tell this my whole company and all of their partners. We’re just sitting around getting paid for nothing apparently. I’ve never realised that. /s

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, it isn’t a new thing. It’s just that the pundits think there are people in dark caves writing code all day with zero human contact. Hasn’t been like that for a long time. Coding is the easy part of the job now for the vast majority if competent coders. Figuring out how to balance what the users want, and what the prod7ct manager tells you to do is the really hard part.

  • ulkesh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Nonsense. But then CEOs rarely know what the hell they’re talking about.

  • riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Todays news: Rich assholes in suits are idiots and don’t know how their own companies are working. Make sure to share what they’re saying.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I’m pretty sure I could write a bot right now that just regurgitates pop science bullshit and how it relates to Line Go Up business philosophy.

      Edit: did it, thanks ChatJippity

      def main():
          # Check if the correct number of arguments are provided
          if len(sys.argv) != 2:
              print("Usage: python script.py <PopScienceBS>")
              sys.exit(1)
          # Get the input from the command line
          PopScienceBS = sys.argv[1]
          # Assign the input variable to the output variable
          LineGoUp = PopScienceBS
          # Print the output
          print(f"Line Go Up if we do: {LineGoUp}")
      if __name__ == "__main__":
          main()
      
  • TriflingToad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 months ago

    Seriously how can these CEOs of a GPU company not talk to a developer. You have loads of them to interview