She’s definitely not Obama. Her weakness is policy. She has intentionally avoided the topic because she would undoubtedly alienate some of that “joy” that they’re doing so well courting.
Thing is, the GOP in general is extremely weak on policy. And Trump is the worst of the bunch.
So she’s probably good, unless the GOP can somehow make her define her stance in certain terms. Which she has always avoided like the plague in the past.
I’m less concerned about the SC and more concerned with random acts terrorism that will come with a decisive loss. They will only hear the case if it’s close and sometimes it seems like Trump is trying to lose.
I’m concerned with how there are about three different terrifyingly-viable ways for Trump to end up with the Presidency that don’t involve getting ≥270 Electoral College votes.
Bush v. Gore 2.0
Jan 6 2.0
Having MAGAs disrupt vote certifications in enough states that neither candidate gets to 270 and the election is thrown to a “one state, one vote” poll in the House.
She is a different version of Obama in his eyes and he already tried all the racism and it didn’t work. It’s fun to watch him squirm.
She’s definitely not Obama. Her weakness is policy. She has intentionally avoided the topic because she would undoubtedly alienate some of that “joy” that they’re doing so well courting.
Thing is, the GOP in general is extremely weak on policy. And Trump is the worst of the bunch.
So she’s probably good, unless the GOP can somehow make her define her stance in certain terms. Which she has always avoided like the plague in the past.
Agreed, she is vague now. I liked her better when she defined things:
https://kamalaharris.medium.com/my-plan-for-medicare-for-all-7730370dd421
Don’t let your guard down. We still have to get so far past the finish line that SCROTUS can’t pull another Al Gore.
That said, I’m quite enjoying watching him squirm as well
Mr. Gore’s name being split on to two different lines for me made me read it as “Artificial Intelligence Gore.”
An Inconvenient Truth 2.0
I’m less concerned about the SC and more concerned with random acts terrorism that will come with a decisive loss. They will only hear the case if it’s close and sometimes it seems like Trump is trying to lose.
I’m concerned with how there are about three different terrifyingly-viable ways for Trump to end up with the Presidency that don’t involve getting ≥270 Electoral College votes.