He still wants all the bad things, just for the “other” people, not for him.

There is a path to redemption, but this guy isn’t on it.

Might well be true. Of note, where there is such a law, they’ll generally be referring to any weapons, and not only firearms.

Blood spatter analysis isn’t quite as nonsense as the rest.

If blood is found underneath an object, you know that the blood got there first, and the object second. If you find a drop of blood among a bunch of fine mist, you may be able to predict that the fine mist is blood from a victim after a gunshot, while the drop might be from someone else, possibly the perpetrator.

Of course there are other observations which are misinterpreted, but the fact remains that blood spatter follows the laws of physics; therefore, it is possible to discover factual information from observing it.

You’re going to have to provide a specific citation for that. If you’re talking about 2A, that right to bear arms is already not a right to carry anywhere at any time.

Blood spatter analysis isn’t quite as nonsense as the rest. There are definitely factual conclusions that can be made based on where blood is found and how it is distributed or shaped.

Polygraph tests are an interrogation tool. While the “results” they produce directly are nonsense, they can be used as a lever to pressure a suspect to confess to a crime - with disregard as to whether they actually committed said crime. People who undergo polygraphs are also known to unload new information immediately after the “test” is over.

Remember, police are allowed to lie to you; you are not allowed to lie to the police. Shut the fuck up. Lawyer.

https://youtu.be/czezRTLHjHo

I only want that guy brought in because he’s not mindful of what’s between him and his target. He almost shot two protesters.

Bring sporting equipment. Golf, hockey, baseball - all very popular athletic pursuits.

In many states, it is illegal to bring weapons of any kind to a protest or demonstration, often whether said event has permits or not.

Not mutually exclusive.

Get out. Either say this to him or do it yourself.

Glory to Arstotzka!

I suspect it’s non-ADHD is linear, while ADHD is multi-dimensional mesh.

I find that semicolon connotes “Concept B follows from, but is distinct from, Concept A”, while parens connote “Concept B follows from, and is intertwined with, Concept A”.

Because all thoughts are intertwined.

Don’t forget [Option A | Option B].

Gideons, with the Bibles.

Just change the one letter.

His presence would surely interfere, but ideally, politicians are supposed to bring their elected authority to bear by coordinating resources (as you describe). It’s much more effective to do that when you’re physically present, or at least not on a Mediterranean vacation six timezones away.

As long as they perceive that they’re hurting their targets more than they hurt themselves, they’ll make that sacrifice.

That’s capitalism.