No, I don’t want to buy one. This came out of a discussion about my brother, who is so much weirder than me if you can believe it, who owns a real human skull.

I don’t know how he got it. I don’t know where he got it from, maybe this company, more importantly, I don’t know why he would want such a thing. He is not a scientist, he works in IT. He did get an MFA in theater, wanted to be a professional theater director and loves Shakespeare, I can’t believe the reason was because he wanted Hamlet to be super authentic.

We’re not all that close, so it really hasn’t come up in conversation. I only know about it because he posted elsewhere a while back that he was on a Zoom meeting at work and he showed it off and couldn’t understand why everyone stopped laughing and got silent. So obviously he thinks it’s cool to own it.

It used to be a person. I’m an atheist and I don’t believe in an afterlife, but that’s just basic disrespect.

Anyway… how can you ethically source a skull and then sell it on the open market?

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    15 days ago

    If you donate your body to science, and they sell the bits they can’t use to get money to do science, are you still fulfilling the original intent of the donation?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      Is that what is happening though? And I would say that you should be made aware that is what will happen before you agree to donate.

      • Nomecks@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        They were just selling themselves as souvenirs. Hardly a good business, unless you’re famous. It would have been more Ferengi if they sold themselves for necrophilia or some other high value kink stuff.

  • TheRedSpade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    16 days ago

    John Oliver had an episode where the main story answers your question.

    Basically, if you donate your body “to science” there’s a chance it could end up with such a company. I wouldn’t call it ethical, but as of now it’s legal.

  • drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    15 days ago

    Look, you buy a car and add pollution in the air. You buy a skull and contribute to people being killed and harvested for skulls. What’s the difference?

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      You don’t see anything ethically wrong with “owning” a piece of a human that could be someone’s ancestor or relative? People really are disgusting pieces of shit.

      • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        Assuming the dead person didn’t mind, no. If I were in a situation where a proven relative of the deceased human would like the skull back, I would give it to them, sure. But if it’s just for art/fantasy, I do not see any problems. I don’t care what happens with my bones after I die.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      I didn’t say there was a problem with him owning a skull. Other than how he’s weird about it, I mean.

      I was talking about this company. I don’t even know how he got it. For all I know, someone who died willed it to him.

      • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 days ago

        I don’t see how he is being weird about it. OK I wouldn’t show it to a zoom meeting full of random people, sure, but nothing else screams weird to me.

        Then again, I work in IT have been described as weird by some people so I suppose I’m not looking at it like usual people would

  • Carrolade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 days ago

    You could collect skulls after informed consent. People could potentially sell/donate the rights to their skull after they’re done using it, with maybe some permission from next-of-kin, since they have a certain degree of claim as well.

    If everyone agrees though, you could then ethically take that skull and sell it to a third party I suppose. It’d be somewhat similar mechanically to using remains for medical education and/or research, except without the noble cause or broader societal benefit.

    Otherwise, in my eyes, this would qualify as grave-robbing and definitely be frowned upon. Nonetheless a fairly common practice throughout history though.

    • Juergen@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 days ago

      I think informed consent is key - and I know I would give mine for the right sum, unless a family member called first dibs. I am planning to be cremated and a few ounces of ashes more or less won’t make a difference.

      I can hardly see any other way to obtain a human skull ethically. If the seller is honest, they should make the signed consent form available to the buyer upon request.

      • Shard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 days ago

        Herein lies the problem. Nowhere on their website can you find any details about informed consent or traceability. All you have are the words “ethically” peppered around the website without any definition as to what they mean by ethically nor any of their processes they use to ensure “ethicalness” of any of their skulls.

    • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 days ago

      My partner and I have a large collection of dead things in and out of jars. If they wanted to live after I was dead, 100% chance they get my skull.

  • sicarius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 days ago

    I don’t see the problem. Loads of people have skulls of other animals on display. Why should a human be treated any different.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      16 days ago

      For one thing, there is very little evidence that most other animals have any sort of reverence for the dead.

      • sicarius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        Probably not what you were thinking but there’s plenty of stories of dogs not leaving their owners after death like Greyfriars bobby.
        Also elephants are known for mourning their dead.
        I think if I donated my body to science and they were all done with it, and they could make more money for research by selling bits off to weirdos that would be fine by me. Maybe put a little QR code on it that people could scan and get a little biography of me. That would probably make archeology a lot easier.

      • Akasazh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        16 days ago

        I could see how one voor find it enjoyable that their skull would be cherished by another human being.

        A guy I knew had a skull from the Roman era, that had a hole in it from a ballista arrow. Not the best way to go, but how cool is it that your head can amaze people two thousand years from now

        • nyctre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 days ago

          There’s no way that wasn’t a replica. How is that skull not in a museum or something?

          • Akasazh@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            16 days ago

            It looked convincing enough, but we were quite young back then. The thing that always stuck with me that the hole in the skull was square shaped. It was only untill later that I learned that ballistae arrows did indeed have square arrowheads.

            But it coud’ve been a replica, though I’m unsure where one would source one in a manner that wasn’t somehow more dubious than having a real one. (The guy was a historian of sorts). Then again, where I live the Roman history isn’t too far away.

            • nyctre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              15 days ago

              People are saying that that website is selling skulls for 2000-3000$. A roman solider skull Would be a lot more expensive than that, I imagine. Given the age and the historical relevance. So that’s two things to be amazed by when looking at that thing, I think.

              If I were him, I’d definitely not mind that fate.

  • Euphorazine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    17 days ago

    Not saying you and I would call it “ethical” but there are for profit companies who will pay for someone’s funeral expenses to claim the body and sell it to researchers, universities, etc. So they didn’t donate their body to science but their family sold it because they couldn’t afford the service on their own.

    Maybe not ethical, but legal, and therefore they may be able to claim it’s “ethical” in advertising.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    16 days ago

    I want someone to drink mead out of my skull after I die and absorb my power. This is my fondest wish.

    • lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 days ago

      Honestly, yeah. I spent decades developing and maintaining it, hopefully will spend a few more decades with it, but after that? I have no use for it anymore, but if it’s still in decent condition, it would be a shame to waste it.

      I’d rather have it be of some use to someone, and “drink mead out of it” is very high up the list, right after “use it for science or education” and right before “use it for semi-realistic (but doubly awesome) historical weapon tests or demos”. Other contenders are “deco piece”, “movie/theatre prop” and “ritual implement”.

      Actually, that probably applies to most of my body. Reuse or repurpose as much as you can, turn the rest into fertiliser.

       

      Failing that (if my spouse or family can’t stand the thought of cremating my remains, I don’t want to force them), at least bury me with some weapons. Not because I believe in Valhalla, I just want to troll some future archaeologist. Bonus points for mixing eras and qualities, e.g. a wallhanger 1700s cavalry sabre, weapons-grade Xiphos and a non-functional gun reproduction, dressed in a 900s Samurai armour.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 days ago

    I choose cremation but before, my penis will be removed and donated for politicizing as a gift to the world famous penis museum. It may not be much to look at, but maybe they can sell it as a chotchky or a keychain trinket. Maybe a guy will hang my jewels from his first cubicle to keep snacks. I’m creative, why not end as weird art. Right?

      • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 days ago

        Somehow after all the years, I’m still at the level of key chain trinket. I need to invent something or become famous so I can at least advance to the $9.99 shelve. Maybe one day I could be at the level of resin in shot glass paper weight…you know, like $19.99 level?