What made everybody move from a corporate social media platform to another corporate social media platform instead of the fediverse?

After all, the Fediverse and Activitypub is much more mature than Bluesky and the copycat AT protocol or Threads and … whatever they use.

  • aloeTGL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    16 days ago

    Fediverse sounds too much like metaverse so people assume it’s crypto bullshit

  • Battle Masker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    for me, it was discoverability. Like, several guides said “use tags” but 4 out of 5 people DON"T. And more often than not, when you do search the tags, you see several posts that aren’t what you wanted at all. Or worse, the tag you search doesn’t have any posts newer than several months to a year. Basically it relied on an honor system where few people had honor.

  • ruckblack@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    16 days ago

    They probably have good discovery and trending post mechanisms. Mastodon makes it a point not to have one, which results in a wholly uninteresting feed for the average user. I’m only on mastodon, but I very rarely use it, because it mostly sucks unless you spend several, several hours trying to track down fun accounts to follow yourself.

    • DelightfullyDivisive@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      16 days ago

      That is my experience too. It’s because there is no distinction between posts and comments, I think. It’s about as interesting as my sms chats with friends would be to strangers.

  • Maxnmy's@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    17 days ago

    I’ll speak about my experience. Bluesky feels like an upgrade to Twitter. There are many algorithmic feeds to choose from, and it’s easy to discover people to follow. Mastodon, on the other hand, is a straight downgrade from Bluesky because it is lacking in those features.

    I imagine a lot of people leaving Twitter feel similarly. They don’t care much about privacy or federation. Bluesky just works, and that’s what matters to them.

    • XNX@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      17 days ago

      What do you mean by privacy? Mastodon doesnt have privacy or encryption

      • Plopp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 days ago

        I guess a lot of people feel like Mastodon is more private because it’s smaller. Which is a kind of privacy, I guess, until it isn’t.

  • EnderMB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    16 days ago

    Several reasons:

    • Mastodon is REALLY unfriendly from a UX perspective. To many, federation is a solution to a problem that doesn’t really exist for them. In their mind, the early model of federation is like email, a problem that was “solved” years ago by having one corporate product that was much better than others (Gmail).
    • Reiterating, why should people care about the fediverse?
    • The fediverse is lacking the user numbers, and those that do post don’t really interact with others. Spend some time with the newhere tag and you’ll see a lot of people that make the occasional post, send a lot of replies, and end up leaving because that engagement ends up with maybe 2 followers. It’s rather clique-y.
    • Some fediverse sites (e.g. Lemmy) have bad reputations, and Mastodon partly suffers from this. Outside of tech, where people argue with each other all the time anyway, there isn’t really anything worthwhile being posted.

    Generally speaking, how is Mastodon any better than Bluesky? How is Lemmy any better than Reddit? If you can’t answer that in a way the average person gives a fuck about, what’s the argument for using them?

    • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      and those that do post don’t really interact with others

      I’ve found quite the opposite on Mastodon. I get WAY more interaction on there than I ever did on Twitter.

      I do a radio show on Monday nights. Despite having more followers on Twitter I never really managed to attract many listeners. Dropped it for a few years and started up again a few months back, publicising solely through Mastodon. Engagement with it is three or four times what it was before.

      It’s essentially a request show, and there have been a couple of weeks where I’ve not had to pick any songs to fill the time, all of it has been filled by listener requests.

      That said, that’s only my experience, it may be different for others.

    • ngwoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      To many, federation is a solution to a problem that doesn’t really exist for them. In their mind, the early model of federation is like email, a problem that was “solved” years ago by having one corporate product that was much better than others (Gmail).

      To add, on top of that, the fediverse is like if gmail could just randomly decide to stop receiving emails from outlook addresses and there’s nothing any user can do about it except make another email for when they want to email outlook users.

      I don’t think fediverse proponents know just how catastrophically this terminates their entire pitch in the minds of 99% of internet users

      • bss03@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 days ago

        if gmail could just randomly decide to stop receiving emails from outlook addresses and there’s nothing any user can do about it

        This is the case right now.

        There’s good reasons GMail doesn’t do that, but there’s absolutely nothing technical preventing from doing that, and I can’t think of anything that legally prevents them from doing that.

        • Mio@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 days ago

          Not leagaly but users will be frustated and leave. They will rollback within a day so you will not need to worry too much.

          • bss03@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 days ago

            “users will be frustated and leave” exactly the same thing can happen to an instance that adds an instance (or wildcard domain) block. I’d be very surprised if no instance has ever rolled back a block.

            Users don’t need to worry about instance blocks on ActivityPub, any more than they have to worry about DNS RBLs for email.

  • adam_y@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    16 days ago

    I use both, but honestly, some mastodon users can’t help but be outright patronising and hostile to newcomers.

    The whole “we don’t do that here” vibe clearly puts folk off. Weirdly, it isn’t the long term users that do that, bug more recent converts.

    Why do you think that is?

  • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    17 days ago

    Mastodon and the fediverse in general are weirdly user-unfriendly, and then some fucking programmer pops in to say,

    “Oh! You can fix that! All you have to do is hop over to their github page and…”

    Lol

    If they can make the user experience good, we might get the basis for a new internet, but they’d have to build it first.

  • poVoq@slrpnk.net
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    “Everyone”? I know exactly zero people that have admitted to having a Bluesky account, but I know plenty that have an Mastodon etc. one.

    I think this is at most a very regional or specific user bubble thing, and official user numbers for these commercial services are never trustworthy.

    • ALostInquirer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      Does Bluesky? Have they been running marketing? Much of what I’ve seen/heard of it has been more a result of Twitter imploding and people bringing up alternatives than any concerted marketing pushes.

      edited for clarity, realized I’d overlooked Threads mention

  • Korthrun@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    In addition to many of the fine points made in other comments I think it’s silly to overlook the power of celebrity worship and weird-ass parasocial relationships with famous people.

    There exists a large number of people who aren’t really interested in discussing <topic_x>, they just want to know what <favourite celebrity whos life I have deluded myself into thinking is attainable by me> thinks about the topic so that they can regurgitate it and feel like they’re “the same”.

    I’m sure if Chappell Roan or whatever “the kids” think is cool these days had jumped to Mastodon we’d be seeing something very different. TBH I’m mildly surprised that we didn’t see more record labels standing up instances. It’s always boggled me that people have just trusted the service desperately trying to be known as “X” as an authority on identity.

    • joel_feila@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 days ago

      One reaon for why any company would rather just an x alternative rather start up a lemmy or mastodon instance of their own is externalize the responsibility. If someone else run the site then you can’t be blamed when it goes down

      • Charzard4261@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 days ago

        Don’t forget about moderation. It’s all fun and games until someone starts posting hate speech, copyrighted material, porn (legal or otherwise) or worse…

  • insaneinthemembrane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    16 days ago

    I’m on both Mastodon and Bluesky but BS feels smoother and gives me more content after following some users and content than Mastodon ever did. I really want MD to work out and I’ll go back there but I have neither the time nor the skills to develop or grow it myself.

    • monobot@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 days ago

      We learned to hate “algorithm” but those can actually be good if creator wants to help us insted of manipulate us.

      Without a friendly algorithm to help us, we have no chance in finding our way around all this information around us.

      • Dame @lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 days ago

        On Bluesky most of the algorithms are made by users, that’s another plus