• M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    The same Hezbollah that claim this was an “act of war” and in nothing I can find give any indication of non Hezbollah casualties? Once again I can link the translated statement from Hezbollah to support this, but since you for some reason will not neither will I.

    Oh and to show this is not a lack of effort by myself here is a link to the information on Vitamin D toxicity

    • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Your argumentation genuinely made me lol, thanks for that. I especially enjoyed the vitamin d article substitution

    • crashfrog@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      3 months ago

      The same Hezbollah that claim this was an “act of war” and in nothing I can find give any indication of non Hezbollah casualties?

      Why would Hezbollah report non-Hezbollah casualties? They’re not the government of Lebanon.

      • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Didn’t you say they were the ones who reported your non-Hezbollah casualty figure though?

        You could just link to what you’re talking about, that might clear up any confusion.

        • crashfrog@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          3 months ago

          Didn’t you say they were the ones who reported your non-Hezbollah casualty figure though?

          I don’t have any “non-Hezbollah casualty figures.” I’m assuming that any casualties Hezbollah doesn’t claim are the civilians.

          You could just link to what you’re talking about

          I’m still not understand what you’re finding unclear.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yes, and that would be why we are wondering how that would be proof of a lack of non-Hezbollah casualties.

        • crashfrog@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          3 months ago

          Well, if you subtract the Hezbollah casualties from the total casualties, there’s hardly any casualties left.

          Are you asking for a source for arithmetic, or something?

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Oh good thing you told us where that info was then. Its not like the numbers of victims are still unknown or unaccounted for. Its also great that you provided all that evidence of “guilt” for everyone injured.

            • crashfrog@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              3 months ago

              en. Its not like the numbers of victims are still unknown or unaccounted for.

              How many are those? Why would there be any unaccounted victims at all?

              • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                It’s hundreds of explosions, some of which were in cars (presumably causing car accidents) and crowded areas. It was terrifying. Victims may not want to come forward since it connects them with a group of people being targeted with fucking bombs, something they personally witnessed. They don’t want to be next. Or they don’t want people to think their deceased loved one was a terrorist.

                • crashfrog@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  It’s hundreds of explosions, some of which were in cars (presumably causing car accidents) and crowded areas.

                  A person injured in a crowded area would be rapidly attended to and accounted for, especially by now, two days later.

                  If there’s an unaccounted victim, it’s somebody off by themselves with a Hezbollah pager and thus not a civilian. So this argument actually works against you.

                  • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 months ago

                    Have you ever worked in emergency medicine or been in an accident? Someone could have been hit with shrapnel and hid it due to sheer adrenaline. People have been shot in mass shootings and had limbs bit off by sharks and not really “noticed.” It’s entirely possible to keep going/dissociate from an injury if you think that the bombing event will continue, if you’re still in danger, if you think acknowledging your wound will put you in danger. Or if you think people will assume your innocent kid that got killed was a terrorist, you might want to lie about how they died so you can have a nice funeral and people won’t remember them like that or accuse your family of being terrorists.

                    There’s also shrapnel from car accidents as well as shrapnel from the bombs.

                    I’m not actually arguing, I was answering your question about why some injuries may have gone unreported by people who weren’t Hezbollah. However, I would say that any groups of innocent casualties seems to show that the attacks were not very specific as originally criticized.

      • czech@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        You wrote that fewer than .1% of casualties from the detonations were not hezbollah. When asked for a source you wrote: hezbollah. When pressed for a source you’ve now countered: “why would hezbollah report that?”.

        We don’t know; it’s your premise. Where did you get that stat?