Authorities in Ohio say they will release body camera footage of a fatal police shooting of a pregnant Black woman.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      I made no such conclusion.

      I mean, the facts are pretty straightforward: she used a deadly weapon (a motor vehicle) to attack pedestrians (the officers).

      Had she simply submitted to the initial arrest, she would have faced a fine and some community service. Shoplifters rarely face anything more serious than that. In an attempt to avoid those minimal consequences, she chose to escalate from a simple property crime to assault with a deadly weapon. The best she could hope for would have been a lengthy prison sentence.

      No, the case is straightforward and boring. The only interesting factor I found in it was fetal alcohol syndrome.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, the facts are pretty straightforward: she used a deadly weapon (a motor vehicle) to attack pedestrians (the officers).

        According to the police.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            The one that was released after your comment. You believe anything anyone who shoots a black person says.

            • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              17
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Trust, but verify. I believed them when they said they had a video, and I believed them when they provided a written description of the video. They would look extraordinarily bad to be caught lying about something so easy to verify, so I saw little reason not to trust.

              It fit the pattern: individual gets caught committing a minor criminal act, but rather than facing the music and accepting the slap on the wrist punishment, they instead choose to escalate to the point of endangering people, and then Pikachu-face when they get shot.

              What does her race have to do with this case?

              Did “being black” stop her from hearing or understanding the officer calmly ordering her to get out of the car? Did “being black” prevent her from seeing the other officer in front of her vehicle? Did “being black” force her to put the car in gear and depress the accelerator?

              I’ll save my outrage for cases like Breonna Taylor, Philando Castile, George Floyd, and other actual victims of police abuse. I have no sympathy for someone who would endanger lives to avoid facing minimal and deserved consequences for their own criminal actions.

              • Government_Worker666@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Witness states she put down the bottles before she left the store. The description of the video states she accelerated towards an officer. The video shows an officer step in front of the slow rolling vehicle. He even takes a step forward right before he jumps on the hood. He was also able to safely get away from the slow moving vehicle after he fired a shot, something that he could have done before choosing to end a life

                • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Witness states she put down the bottles before she left the store.

                  Whether she did or did not take the bottles is completely irrelevant to the shooting. A complaining witness claimed she had; officers had sufficient cause to conduct a stop and investigate that complaint.

                  The description of the video states she accelerated towards an officer. The video shows an officer step in front of the slow rolling vehicle.

                  The video shows an officer stepped in front of a stopped vehicle. That vehicle was later driven toward the officer. The description is accurate; your claim is not.

                  Pedestrians have the right-of-way over vehicles. Even if she was moving when he stepped in front of her, she was obligated to stop, both under traffic laws, and per the lawful instructions given by the officers. She was not justified in driving toward the officer.

                  She escalated from being suspected of shoplifting to committing assault with a deadly weapon.

                  He was also able to safely get away from the slow moving vehicle after he fired a shot, something that he could have done before choosing to end a life

                  That might be relevant if he had a “duty to retreat” from the assault. Do you believe he had a legal obligation to retreat? If so, under what legal theory do you believe he acquired that obligation?

                  • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Rhe police had her license plate number. Her physical description. They had the nature of her offence being a non-violent crime. The car did not quickly accelerate and the police officer against all common safety advice put himself in the path of the vehicle.

                    That his first action was to pull a gun and fire and not just get out of the way and approach the problem at a later time in a less heated situation is excessive force. Back when I worked security I watched lots people pull this stunt on police officers before and surprise - none of them got shot and none of the police got hit by a car and everybody still got their resisting arrest charge at the end if the day.

                    If you are scared enough your psychological reaction is to stay in a place of safety or to flee and cars provide the opportunity to both… Which is why you aren’t supposed to put yourself in the path of someone’s potential escape with your body. People are panicy animals who can divert entirely to basic instinct, particularly when they are hurt or in a lower estimation of being able to defend themselves like pregnancy.

                    This is an example of someone killed because of bad police training and decision making that ignored entirely how scary even normally benign police interactions can be to black women. If she was worried about harm to her baby because of the police’s habit of putting people forcefully on the ground or slamming them against cars she would be placed under extreme distress having one yell at her to leave her car like they meant to do her violence.

                    The police here created wholecloth the “need” to shoot this woman. From the moment they started escalating, blocking her route of egress and not taking the moment of thought to ask if this could not be de-escalated and addressed later safely given the minor nature of the complaint.

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                What does her race have to do with this case?

                It’s the only reason you believed the police before they released the video.

                I’ll save my outrage for cases like Breonna Taylor, Philando Castile, George Floyd.

                As though you don’t have excuses for why each of them had it coming too.

                • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  It’s the only reason you believed the police before they released the video.

                  No. I believed their easily verifiable description of the events.

                  As though you don’t have excuses for why each of them had it coming too.

                  I’m more pissed off about each of them than you are. Castile in particular.

                  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    No. I believed their easily verifiable description of the events.

                    It wasn’t verifiable before they posted the video. In the absence of evidence, you believed the people who shot a black person.