I’d suggest elevating more federal court justices for a period, durich which time they decide as a group what to take up and then randomly assign 5 or 7 to a case. After their stint they can either return to federal court or retire.
I haven’t heard of a lot of jury tampering trials go well. And usually isnt it more of a mafia style “nice family you got there, would be a shame if something happened to it” situation?
If we’re comparing with the current SC everything is an improvement. But if we’re going to change things, I would prefer a system that does not rely on easily manipulated, uneducated masses.
The SC is hopelessly corrupt and should be dismantled.
I’d suggest elevating more federal court justices for a period, durich which time they decide as a group what to take up and then randomly assign 5 or 7 to a case. After their stint they can either return to federal court or retire.
Annual reminder that the SCOTUS decided that the SCOTUS has the power of Constitutional review.
they should just require a randomly selected jury for any ruling and the justices only job should be deciding what to present to jurors
I’m not sure I’d like to trust a random jury to determine the interpretation of laws
I can guarantee a randomly selected jury would do a better job than the current court.
Yeah you’d have to buy a dozen RVs instead of just one.
I haven’t heard of a lot of jury tampering trials go well. And usually isnt it more of a mafia style “nice family you got there, would be a shame if something happened to it” situation?
If we’re comparing with the current SC everything is an improvement. But if we’re going to change things, I would prefer a system that does not rely on easily manipulated, uneducated masses.
If memory serves, the French invented a huge apparatus for that, inspired by a bread slicer.
The best thing since sliced nobility
Get yer fresh oafs right here! Gottem fresh! Pre-sliced & prêt-à-mànger! Gettim while they’re hot!