It was only in 1969 (nice) that fungi officially became its own separate kingdom.

      • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Except, in cheese and some sausages. Also, I’m not sure yeast counts, because it’s usually dead by the time we eat it in our food.

        • Contramuffin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          not sure yeast counts because it’s usually dead

          As long as the organism is dead, we’re not eating it? Time to have some steak then, surely that’s not a cow!

          • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            lol, yeah, but when baking, the yeast gets destroyed pretty bad. i didn’t dare call it yeast at that point, but maybe you’re right.

  • TheLowestStone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Fuck you op. Mushrooms are plants, Pluto is a planet, and that’s the truth from one edge of this flat Earth to the other.

    ~disclaimer: this is a joke~

    • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Honestly? Flat earth? It’s not even funny as a joke. That entire movement has been so incredibly detrimental, and dangerous. It has shattered families, and been an instruction manual for other conspiracy theorists. And the worst thing of all is that it makes actual, real facts about how the earth is in, in reality, a hollow shell with a breathable atmosphere in its inferior, come across as just as crazy as flat earth. How are we supposed to spread the truth of hollow earth when flat earthers are out there making us look crazy? Just because hollow earth also points out that the government is lying about the earth doesn’t mean we’re the same! People need to know about hollow earth! Otherwise, we’ll never be able to heal the housing market by building condos inside the earth!

    • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      Honestly? Flat earth? It’s not even funny as a joke. That entire movement has been so incredibly detrimental, and dangerous. It has shattered families, and been an instruction manual for other conspiracy theorists. And the worst thing of all is that it makes actual, real facts about how the earth is in, in reality, a hollow shell with a breathable atmosphere in its inferior, come across as just as crazy as flat earth. How are we supposed to spread the truth of hollow earth when flat earthers are out there making us look crazy? Just because hollow earth also points out that the government is lying about the earth doesn’t mean we’re the same! People need to know about hollow earth! Otherwise, we’ll never be able to heal the housing market by building condos inside the earth!

  • Today@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    I have family in Streator, IL, home of Clyde Tombaugh, so we’re die hard planet pluto.

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Let’s just acknowledge that anything big enough to be round is a planet. That’s the bare minimum criteria.

      Orbit shapes and clear paths don’t matter, the Solar system isn’t a typical stellar system, many aren’t so stable and ordered, especially in binary and triplet star systems. So the pedantry around the shapes of the orbits of the outer kuiper planets is a very silly thing to argue about. After all most orbits in binary and triplet systems aren’t even predictable long term, let alone not circular.

        • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I believe the rule of thumb is binary planets’ barycentre is external to either body. This is the case with Pluto/Charon, I think it’s also the case with Earth/Moon.

          • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            That’s a good rule of thumb… but it’s probably not enough; no reasonable definition would call Jupiter a star, or even a brown dwarf, or the Solar System a binary system, yet the Sol - Jupiter barycentre is outside the sun… (the whole system’s barycentre is sometimes inside the sun, but that’s due to Saturn’s, Uranus’, and Neptune’s pulls cancelling Jupiter’s).

            I’d call the barycentre thing a necessary but not sufficient requirement; a proper definition of double planet should probably also take into account other factors like the relative mass and density of the bodies, and their minimum and maximum distance.

            • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Yeah, I went and checked after posting.

              My hunch is that if the moon was closer it would ‘drag’ the barycentre closer to the moon.

              Which, given the moon is slowly receeding, means it was probably a binary early on in the formation of the solar system.

              • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Other way around, the further apart the objects are the less likely the barycentre is to be inside one of them, you can picture it as a rubber band with a dot drawn on it, the more you stretch it the further the dot gets from both ends even if it gets further from one end faster.

  • thenextguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ve never even considered whether they’re plants or not. I guess I always assumed they were, but now it makes sense that they’re not. But I can’t imagine anyone having a tizzy over it either way.

  • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    You can use mushrooms in Plants vs Zombies.

    It isn’t called “Plants and Fungi vs Zombies.”

    Ergo, mushrooms are plants.

    Checkmate, atheists!

  • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    I overheard someone talking about veganism and said they only eat plants. I asked them about mushrooms, “of course it’s fine, those are plants”.
    No amount of convincing worked.

    So I’ve seen it once.

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      If anything is close to having a consciousness and experiencing an array of emotion, including suffering. That’s a mushroom, much more than a plant.

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        First time hearing this but mushroom is a protein source so from diet perspective, I see it as a meet type food. Deff not vegatable

        • protist@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 months ago

          Mushrooms have some protein, but not very much. They aren’t a very good source of protein

        • teft@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          So are chickpeas or edamame meat to you? Because they have like 5 times as much protein by weight than mushrooms.

          • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            3 months ago

            I would go with, based totally on feelz, that no because it generally note used like that.

            As you think is all super science here, trust me bro

      • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Actual animals are far more likely to feel pain that fungi. Do fungi even have a nervous system?

        • shneancy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          so hang on, mushrooms are like uh, well not milk, but as if say a cow regrew its meat every season? or maybe like a lizard that regrows its tail?

          mushrooms are weird, man

          wild idea, would it be possible to hijack mycelium with animal DNA and make it grow mushroom shaped meat??

    • ShaggyBlarney@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      71
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Mushrooms are plants in the culinary sense. Like strawberries, blackberries and raspberries are berries in the culinary sense.