And why?

  • mlfh@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    1 month ago

    Forgejo, a Gitea fork used by Codeberg. I chose it because it’s got the right balance of features to weight for my small use case, it has FOSS spirit, and it’s got a lovely package maintainer for FreeBSD that makes deployment and maintenance easy peasy (thanks Stefan <3).

    • thirdBreakfast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      +1 for Forgejo. I started on Gogs, then gathered that there had been some drama with that and Gitea. Forgejo is FOSS, simple to get going, and comfortable to use if you’re coming from GitHub. It’s actively maintained, and communication with the project is great.

    • zelifcam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ve been meaning to switch over from Gitea to Forgejo for ever. I’ll get it done tomorrow ;)

      • Foster Hangdaan@lemmy.fosterhangdaan.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Definitely best to get that done ASAP. Forgejo being a drop-in replacement for Gitea won’t be guaranteed ever since the hard fork:

        To continue living by that statement, a decision was made in early 2024 to become a hard fork. By doing so, Forgejo is no longer bound to Gitea, and can forge its own path going forward, allowing maintainers and contributors to reduce tech debt at a much higher pace, and implement changes - whether they’re new features or bug fixes - that would otherwise have a high risk of conflicting with changes made in Gitea.

    • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I do the same. Forgejo works really well, and I’m also absolutely stoked for forge fed some day.

      It also has things like CI/CD. It’s a really really good project and self hosting it is relatively painless. Even integrating it with my identity provider over oidc was no problem.

  • GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    I use github to star other repos because almost all repos are on github. A star supports the project.

    I host my stuff on github because everyone else is on github and can star my repos.

    I have access to codeberg

    • toastal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      https://dagster.io/blog/fake-stars

      ‘Stars’ are such a dubious, gamed feature telling you little value about a project’s quality. It doesn’t really ‘support’ a project, but it does feed into the anxiety & social media sludge on the platform. We would be better without them.

  • ramenu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    Codeberg for public repositories, cgit (if that even counts) on my own server for private ones

  • m4m4m4m4@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 month ago

    Codeberg. I host my web portfolio live there and even did a small contribution to kbin when it was alive. It’s great though now I’d want to look at forgejo.

  • Mike Wooskey@lemmy.thewooskeys.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 month ago

    I self-host forgejo. I’m not a heavy or advanced user, and it suits my needs. I barely use github any more: mainly to star repos I like, and find and use repos (there’s a ton there - it’s almost ubiquitous).

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Same. Their policy is very reasonable in my opinion. They still allow non foss stuff for like personal config files which is nice. The only time I ever got a warning was when I uploaded a 100MB file to a private repo without any license. It was just a banner on the repo. (I was messing around with alpine images.)

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    self-hosted gitlab.

    I love it. I can clone external repos on a schedule and build my projects based on my local cache. I’m even running some automation tasks like image deployments out of it too.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        pipeline schedules. once a month I clone the remote repo into a local branch, and push it back to my repo with an automatic merge request assigned to me. review & merge kicks off build pipeline.

        I also use pipeline schedules to do my own ddns to route 53 using terraform. runs once every 15 minutes.

        also once a week I’ve got about 50 container images I cache locally that I build my own images from.

    • Drew@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 month ago

      forgejo is a fork made by a nonprofit and deals with security issues much quicker

  • ryannathans@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Gitlab

    Open source

    Free ultimate for open source organisations, we get a lot of free pipeline minutes without having to run our own servers for devops. Allows us to focus on development

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    I use Gitlab, but i’m becoming increasingly more unhappy with it over time.

    When i have enough resources run another local machine, im planning to switch to switch to Codeberg, with selfhosted Woodpecker CI instead