I’m talking about a fan theory, that if true doesn’t drastically upend the fundamentals of the fiction it is set in.

Mine is that in the American Dad episode ‘Can I Be Frank With You’, that Snot’s uncle is actually just another Roger persona. He appears suddenly and conveniently to pitch a bizarre scheme, he loves hanging around with teen boys and doing drugs, and the very instant that the plan has a setback he kills himself out of sight of everyone else. That’s just Roger in a suit and glasses.

Edit: Ok, so, people are having trouble with the word “inconsequential”.

  • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    They can be written now though

    Yeah…? Then tell me why in fuck’s name (or should it be facks?) ‘oo’ can represent six different sounds (food, book, door, blood, cooperation, brooch), for instance, and how to tell them apart, or why the letters ‘a’, ‘e’, ‘o’, ‘aa’, and ‘ea’ are used to represent the same exact sound in the words father, sergeant, body, bazaar, and heart…

    Let me assure you that this nonsense is many orders of magnitude more confusing to people learning English as a second language than the ‘th’ shit!

    • ÞlubbaÐubba@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      What makes you so sure? One letter for one sound is a lot less complicated ðan two letters representing two sounds.

      Also, you clearly didn’t check my profile where I have a worksheet revising all ðose oðer issues too.

      I just don’t use ðem because I know asshats like you will just get even angrier if I start taking you up on ðat supposed concern and I don’t feel like dealing wið you all over every word I write.

      • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        One letter for one sound is a lot less complicated ðan two letters representing two sounds.

        Most languages that use alphabets have digraphs representing different sounds than their composing letters. It’s trivial to understand that ‘th’ represents a different sound than ‘t’ or ‘h’.

        Most sane languages, on the other hand, don’t use the same letter or digraph to represent half a dozen different sounds (and when they do they use diacritic marks to distinguish them… which English only uses, without explanation, in borrowed words like fiancé or façade, which might actually be more confusing to native speakers than to ESL ones), or half a dozen letters and digraphs to represent the same sound.

        you clearly didn’t check my profile

        I’ve got enough of a headache from deciphering your posts, thank you

        asshats

        Pot, kettle…

          • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            You have to be trolling lmao you can’t actually be this mad

            Also aren’t Thomas and Thai the same sound?

            • ÞlubbaÐubba@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              2 days ago

              How mad would you feel if some innocent fun you were up to got you accosted as if you’d gone about shooting everyone’s firstborn in ð head?

        • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Really? They read pretty straightforward to me. THe only real issue I have is that I can’t hear a distinction between a thorn and an eth, so the usage seems arbitrary to me. I know that Icelandic people say there’s a difference, and at least one has tried to explain it, but I can’t hear it.

          • apostrofail@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Ether & either are the same word in everything but the voicing of the ‘th’. Other voicing distinctions in English are like those as between fox & vox or sip & zip. Done ‘correctly’ you can feel your throat vibrate (tho not all languages have voicing & those native speakers can find it difficult).

            • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Yeah, I’m not feeling a distinction in any of those in the way I speak. :/

              Ether/either to me only sound different in the e/ei. Same with fox/vox and sip/zip (if someone just said the word itself, without context, I don’t think I could tell which they were saying because the f and v sounds are also very close to each other in my ear).

              • apostrofail@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                24 hours ago

                Skill issue! Nah, I have met plenty people that have the same reaction (English isn’t their first language). However, these sound are distinguishable by native speaker and will leave folks confused on occasion due to the ambiguity, or worse, hearing the wrong word entirely. The good news is that it can be learned and isn’t that difficult—you could probably pick it up from a video tutorial in a couple of minutes in your native language to which then it is just practice.

                  • apostrofail@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    15 hours ago

                    That’s quite weird then since f & v, s & z, þ & ð are distinguishable sounds based on voicing. The only exception that is pretty wide spread for “th” sounds is in Ireland, but there is a quality difference is the aspiration between the two usually. Are you sure you are paying attention the vibrations of the throat?