So a few months back I asked about you guys os in c/asklemmy, so this time I wanna ask about your desktops you use on this same account.
(I use kde but plan to move to cinnamon I find kde buggy and gnome tracker3 randomly broke for no reason so yh idk if these happened to anybody)

  • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    KDE for my main PC. Pretty with floating panels, KDE Connect, QT apps are often the best apps in their class and are perfectly integrated (FreeCAD, krita, okular, kdenlive, vlc, dolphin, etc…) And konsole is also very full featured.

    I don’t know what KiCAD uses, but it also seems very well integrated into the KDE desktop unlike most gnome apps.

    XFCE on MX Linux for an old Intel Compute Stick to keep it very usable.

  • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    18 hours ago

    GNOME because it’s the only good option that looks modern and has proper development. Excuses of KDE fanboys that GNOME team makes weird decisions are not accepted.

    • shapis@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      They do make some strange choices. But yeah, I agree. Also, on Gnome, everything else feels a bit rough around the edges.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I like both for different reasons. I’m hoping Cosmic will be a good blend of features from both, once it’s ready for the general public

      • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        Mate, lxqt and even xfce look very old. I know they can’t have fancy effects but I think it’s weird they don’t come with a modern theme. They could make them look at least like Cinnamon. Even Windows 10 didn’t have rounded corners and looked great, with or without blur. Simplicity can look good imo.

        Cinnamon is great but it’s GTK3 and a little bit older in terms of design (though it’s more sane than whatever the new trends are so it’s not bad but just not my thing).

        Budgie isn’t a very big project so idk how consistent it is (it’s something I care about a lot). Though I think I never tried it myself.

        But actually I don’t hate all of that projects. I just like GNOME and it works so so so well for me. My troll behavior towards other DEs is just a joke inspired by “Mii beta” YouTube channel. Btw KDE has performance, even though it’s more than feature-rich. That’s impressive.

  • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    KDE on my main gaming PC, or if I want something that looks really modern and sleek without tons of setup/tweaking on another PC.

    Mint with Cinnamon if I want a #justworks setup that is rock stable and I don’t need to look sexy.

    My side business laptop uses LMDE with Cinnamon for that reason. I need that thing to be rock stable and dependable at all times.

    Cinnamon has been more stable for me than any other DE, and in my experience, is just as performant as other low-spec favorites like XFCE. My fresh install of LMDE with Cinnamon right after boot uses about 850MB of memory. My testing with XFCE was about the same, maybe 50-75MB less, which for my use case is effectively identical.

    Not crapping on XFCE though, I like playing with it on one of my old thinkpads. Not a fan at all of Gnome, I’ve tried to like it for years, but I just don’t care for it, and I experience quite a few bugs.

    I plan on trying the new Cosmic DE soon, it seems like Gnome done better, and I could see myself liking it from the reviews I’ve watched.

  • _lunar@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    trinity because it’s lighter than almost everything else while having more features than almost everything else

  • ElectronBadger@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    44 minutes ago

    i3. Superb for keyboard-driven environment. Ultra fast, so responsive and configurable. The best.

  • pr06lefs@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Xmonad with XFCE in no-desktop mode.

    I can use the xfce tools to configure things like mouse and screen settings, but visually it’s just xmonad.

  • grapemix@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Enlightenment. It’s pretty and really fast. Of course you can’t complete with the speed of tile wm. But their development speed is so slow…

    • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I’ve been experimenting with DEs on a low end machine (celeron n3010, 2gb ram), and so far, I’m still on xfce, but I forgot to test Enlightenment. Gonna give it a try.

  • I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Gnome.

    With NoMachine to my Windows Host, hot keys go to the host as intended.

    Rustdesk can’t do it in any config and they don’t care at this stage.

  • monovergent 🏁@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    XFCE4. It’s intuitive and predictable without sacrificing the ability to customize it exactly the way I want (with Chicago95 ofc). The built-in panel widgets are nothing short of amazing: battery, CPU, RAM, network, and disk monitors with labels toggled off to save space and a clock with only what I need on one line: MM/DD HH:mm:ss

    Enough features so that it “just works” (no nitpicking through config files), especially on laptops, without being bloated in any way. Bonus of its lightweight nature is that I can keep my Debian/XFCE setup consistent across all of my machines, both old and new.

    Can’t wait for the finished xfwm4 port to wayland so I don’t have to sacrifice some security running X11 and so I can do fractional scaling on hidpi machines.

  • Trent@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Xfce. Partly because I’ve used it for a long time, but mostly because it does what I need it to do and little else.

  • Jure Repinc@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    KDE Plasma on all my computers and also as desktop mode on Steam Deck. because it supports the latest technologies especially when it comes to graphics (HDR, VRR) also has best support for Wayland and multi-monitors. It looks great out of the box and it has a lot of features out of the box and I do not need to battle with adding some extensions that break with almost every update. KDE Plasma is also the most flexible desktop and I can set the workflow really to fit my desires and I can actually set many options and settings. And despite all these built-in features and configurability it still uses very few system resources and is very fast and smooth. Oh and the KDE community is one of the most welcoming I have met in FOSS world, and they listen to their users instead of the our way or the high way mentality I have so often encountered in GNOME for example. So yeah TLDR KDE Plasma is the one I like the most of all in the industry, even when compared to proprietary closed alternatives.

  • The Doctor@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I’m running MATE on my laptop. It gives me what I need (a task bar, space for some instrumentation, the usual desktop functionality, a way to start applications) and nothing that I don’t care about (wobbling windows, compiz, stuff like that). My DE is a tool; I use tools that don’t get in my way because I have work to do.

    I might give COSMIC a try in a few months, I haven’t decided yet.