Peanut, who has amassed more than half a million Instagram followers, was euthanized by officials to be tested for rabies.

Peanut, the Instagram-famous squirrel that was seized from its owner’s home Wednesday, has been euthanized by New York state officials.

The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation took Peanut, as well as a raccoon named Fred, on Wednesday after the agency learned the animals were “sharing a residence with humans, creating the potential for human exposure to rabies," it said in a joint statement with the Chemung County Department of Health.

Both Peanut and Fred were euthanized to test for rabies, the statement said. It was unclear when the animals were euthanized.

  • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    They could have, but if the animal had already bitten a human, that extra few weeks’ wait is dangerous.

    • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      got it, this was pure animal control spite. they only claimed a bite after they seized the animal ‘for testing’. their timeline is bullshit.

      at least some good came of it

      Longo and his wife moved to Upstate New York last year to start P’Nuts Freedom Farm Animal Sanctuary, which is named for his pet and officially opened in April 2023

    • rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      These keyboard warriors don’t understand how fucked up rabies can get. Near 100% fatal once the infected becomes symptomatic, and it’s probably one of the worst disease-related deaths I can imagine. I’d rather take a cyanide pill.

      I live near a forest where the fox population had to be culled because of the potential contact between humans or their pets and infected animals. There were billboards and television announcements that warned against approaching a wild animal that is acting friendly because it’s an indicator of infection.

      • Talaraine@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        These animals lived with their owner for years and were consistently photographed for Instagram. Yeah, people know how bad rabies is. They clearly didn’t have it.

        And officials are saying that no wildlife rehab service in the entire state of New York could take these two in? Internet famous, celebrity animals? Man, whoever believes that, I’ve got some land to sell ya.

        • rtxn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          They clearly didn’t have it.

          How can you tell? The incubation period of rabies can last for years.

          Internet famous, celebrity animals?

          They were squirrels on Instagram. That amounts to nothing.

          • Talaraine@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            They mean donations to whomever takes them in. Believe me, that means something to them. These guys never even tried.

          • Dirac@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            2 months ago

            Talk about bad faith arguments, lemme guess, you filed the complaint?

      • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        There is a prophylactic for rabies. The squirrel had to be destroyed because it bit a human whose job it was to work with animals suspected of having rabies. These people are already trading human well-being for the sake of the price of a slightly expensive shot. It’s theater to suddenly pretend to give a shit about rabies after you’ve had one of your employees get bit.

      • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Just have to chime in and say 100% fatal once symptomatic. I really hope someone corrects me but I’m pretty sure there has never been a confirmed case with a recovery; we have a treatment that works, but has to be given relatively soon after exposure.

        Edit: lol, was the downvote for me hoping I was wrong, or being wrong?

        • rtxn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          There were cases where symptomatic patients survived, but the number is in the lower single digits and they all suffered debilitating neural damage. I wouldn’t call it recovery, no.

          The immunoglobulin treatment aims to eliminate the pathogen before it can infect the nervous system. Once that happens, once the headaches start, it’s game over.

          • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Oh wow, that’s pretty awesome (not the debilitating neural damage part), I was always under the impression that by the first symptom it was a death sentence.

            I still never want anything to do with it, but at least it isn’t as bleak as I had been lead to believe.

            • rtxn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              It’s called the Milwaukee protocol, and it’s considered to be a failure.

              The patient is put in a medically induced coma and treated with strong antiviral medication until the natural immune system can produce antibodies, but even a successful treatment doesn’t guarantee survival. Also, the debilitating neural damage. Honestly, I might still prefer a morphine overdose.

    • tate@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Anyone bitten by a wild an animal should be treated for rabies. To wait for the animal to be tested, quickly or slowly, is just foolish. This animal could have been quarantined and observed without any danger to the bite victim.

      edit: the animal needn’t be wild, just as this one was not.

      • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        the prophylactic really fucking sucks to take AFAIK, you want to avoid it just a little bit less than rabies.

        • Cypher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          The newer vaccine is far less painful and even then, there’s not much that’s as bad as rabies.

          You want to avoid rabies harder than anything other than being immolated… and really that still might be preferable because it is faster.

          • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            The vaccine was separate from the post-exposure prophylactic I had thought. I will look it up for myself.