• cultsuperstar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    And his supporters will still vote him. Even Elon has been saying that if Trump wins, there will be a “temporary” financial crisis. The thing is, “temporary” can mean months or years depending on your scale. But we know financial crises don’t last for a week or two.

    • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      18 hours ago

      he means that Trump and his billionaire friends (including Elon) will make lots of money while common folks suffer but that is all worth it because they will make M’uricah great again

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Hopefully, he strokes out before the EC casts their votes in December. If that happens, we can end up with a Harris/Vance administration.

        • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Yeah, I was a little off on the timeline… If he strokes out after the EC casts their votes, but before they are counted in the House, then Vance will be properly elected to the vice presidency, but the House is required to immediately vote on the Presidency. They only get to select from the top three EC vote winners. With Harris being the only candidate to win any EC votes for president, the House is constitutionally required to elect her. Harris/Vance.

          If I were a Republican, I’d table-flip that outcome, but theoretically…

    • futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I wonder how long it will be until the Trump vs Musk power struggle. My guess is early summer.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      18 hours ago
      • A lot of Americans think when he talks about doing bad things, it’s all talks,
      • when he talks about making the economy better, it’s all in good faith,
      • all the “necessary evil” can be undone in the next election cycle,
      • and business controls the narrative, that would highly benefit under trump.

      Yeah, and boring and ineffective liberals that trying to take the moral high ground every time the right takes yet another low.

      • immutable@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Honestly I’m not sure American businesses are very smart.

        I imagine corpos do want trump, but it seems as short sighted as going after quarterly profits ahead of all else.

        Ok, so you own a corporation and want those pesky “water break” regulations that are really cutting into your profits to go away. So you back trump. He tweets out “WORKERS DRINKING WATER ON THE CLOCK, SAD AND BIGLY BAD” and they decide that’s an official act and you can squeeze an extra 15 minutes out of your workers.

        Meanwhile, he puts a 20% tariff on all your inputs.

        I don’t support, but could at least understand, companies wanting this guy out of some rank greed. But he’s articulated positions that would be awful for most businesses. Every serious economist has looked at his tariff plan and gone “oh yea, that would destroy the economy”

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    He said he will be a dictator for one day. Also mused in detail about how great it would be to have one really tough day or night where the gloves came off. Sounded like a strong vigilante rallying call, to every raging nutjob who really wants to go out and kick some gay ass, or whatever.

    • dorumon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Well they will have to go through my guns first. I’m not going down without a fight.

  • Nytixus@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is the first time a politician is honest about something.

    But it’s for the absolutely wrong reasons.

    This is just blatantly saying “HEY! I’M GOING TO BE ABSOLUTE SHIT TO YOU ALL! AND IT’S GOING TO BE ROUGH! AND IT’S GOING TO BE NASTY! BLOODY!”

    Like okay okay, we have had months leading up to this to know. We don’t need you to remind us yet again about how you’ll do things.

  • Pulsar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Trump will do a great job. The SCOTUS gave him full immunity, so what can go wrong?

      • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        I’m so divided on this. I would love to see him do anything to mitigate the damage. But I fear that almost anything could tip us into a rural versus urban civil war. I beg all leftists to procure a gun(s), learn gun safety, and learn how to shoot.

        Preferably in the next month because I wouldn’t be surprised if sales are restricted.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          All I’m going to say on that, is this:

          What guns you do have…. Lock them up securely. (Ideally, behind 3 locks- the room, a gun safe, and an individual cable or trigger lock.)

          We don’t need more headlines like “five yo shoots family”.

            • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              It isn’t just about kids. For one thing firearms are expensive and valuable, and increases your risks of being broken into. (Most thieves, though, will only target easy victims.)

              The other thing is each lock is one more conscious choice with firearms. It’s not much, but it does provide a decision-point where you can choose something else when you find yourself in a mental health crisis.

              And for home defense…. It’s almost certain if it changes outcomes… it’ll be hurting you, if it’s stored open. (Now if you carry in your home, that’s different, but also… well we won’t get into that.)

              • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                It’s a good point and we do have trigger locks. I don’t want to ever have to hurt someone but especially after yesterday I’m not taking any chances.

      • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        It would take more than a couple. Trump is terrible on his own, but he isn’t the sole problem, he’s largely just a symptom of the bigger problem.

    • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Nobody is going to change who they are and how they want to live because of Putin’s fat orange bitch.

  • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    22 hours ago

    The Dems are going to lose not once but twice to this guy that anyone even a little progressive could have handedly beat.

      • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Keep telling yourself that. Maybe the Dems should get their own version of Donald Trump haha.

      • Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Dude face it, the DNC is completely flaccid and ineffectual as long as it tries to appeal to institutionalist values during a populist cultural zeitgeist.

        And the Democratic party isn’t going to benefit from trying to beat Xenophobic Nationalism™: the Party at its own game of xenophobic nationalism by ceasing to counter their rhetoric on immigration like they did once Biden took office.

      • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 hours ago

        No wrong, Trump actually didn’t perform any better than last time. It’s Harris that couldn’t even match the performance of Biden haha.