• endeavor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 days ago

    Which control panel? There’s like 20 of them and a new worse one gets added every other year.

  • _____@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    9 days ago

    pretty much every windows GUI framework is trash or a pain in the ass to deal with except for Avalonia (my beloved), but it’s more cross platform.

    I’m not sure if this is 100% real but it very well could be. although imo makes me think of skill issue (not because the system makes sense, but these problems don’t really seem like problems to me, just minor set backs)

      • _____@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        well, no. everything is a god damn web app because everything runs browsers.

        so why write native (device) applications if the device can run a browser ? just write code for the browser, which also runs on desktop. now you have a cross platform app without needing 5 different teams

    • Naia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      9 days ago

      I haven’t done much with UI in general, but the one time I thought of making some UI stuff in windows I gave up.

      Even modifying an existing .net program someone else made for a feature I wanted was a nightmare.

      • _____@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        9 days ago

        Yep, I was shocked to see that there is no defacto 1st party framework and during my time searching online I found lots of “use x, use y, no y is dead and none uses it, no x is terrible” which is how I found Avalonia.

        I still don’t think there’s a solid Windows gui framework, but I haven’t looked in years.

    • spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      The settings app is the new control panel. There’s just also the legacy control panel that they’ve been trying to remove for years. It’s such a shit show that I’ve memorized the run string for the applets I have to use frequently, because it’s a fucking nightmare trying to remember where they moved this in which version of the os.

      • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 days ago

        Keep them memorized. The old tools just work, even if MICROS~1 tries to hide them and replace them with useless crap apps.

      • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        Man, the Device and Printers one is long as hell lol

        shell:::{A8A91A66-3A7D-4424-8D24-04E180695C7A}
        
      • unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        The thing with the Control panel (speaking as a former Windows user up until a year ago) was its consistency. Since the Aero era things have remained in more-or-less the same place. Sure, some things got added, some renamed and some deleted, but the basics I needed (mouse sensitivity, battery settings on the laptop, the Add/remove software page, search indexing, printers) has all stayed in more or less the same place.

        Then 10 happened. And sure, Settings was great for a lot of stuff. But when Settings didn’t have the option (or I lost my nerves trying to find it), Control Panel was the way to go. I’d find what I needed pretty much instantly, since was always one of the same 20-odd things I need.

        Even then, everything just seemed faster in Control panel. Was it more responsive? Were there less animations? Were more things crammed into one screen so less clicking and scrolling was involved? Is it just my imagination?

        Honestly, I don’t know.

        By the time I got used to the new Settings app, one of the big Windows 10 makeovers happened and jumbled up about 10% of Settings. Objectively not much, but just enough to irritate.

        And now with 11, they not only made Settings unrecognizable, they also cranked the spyware up to, well, 11. And there’s no Control Panel to default on when in doubt (or fuming with rage).

        All in all, while Control Panel wan’t what kept me on Windows, 11 losing it did ease the transition, since it meant having to learn a new way of doing things either way. Might as well make it a way that hopefully won’t change once a random design exec decides “this is ugly and it has to go”.

        Honestly, KDE Plasma’s Settings are where it’s at. It’s right between the functional and informstional density of Control panel and the simplicity, visual appeal and saner structure of Settings. Shame it uses Qt, which from what I hear, is god-awful as far as UI toolchains go.

        • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          Kde settings impressed me. I had to fix my mouse and put the wheel on backwards. Took me a few hours messing around regedit to find it. In kde control panel its just a toggle.

          Also funny thing is windows backup control panel has 3 options and advanced options. Advanced options lists the same 3 options.

  • wreckingball4good@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Can confirm. I worked as a contract program manager for Microsoft with O365, Azure Gloval Ecosystrm, and yes, the dreaded Windows team. I wakk out out my last two Microsoft jobs in the middle of a shift. I would do it again.

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    149
    ·
    9 days ago

    …maybe it’s better that the Windows source code remain closed.

    At the same time, I’d love to see the developers of the world glimpse at that eldritch cognitohazard and collectively go insane.

    • dan1101@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 days ago

      At least modern hardware runs the spaghetti code much better than Windows XP used to run.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      71
      ·
      9 days ago

      Maybe we’ve been misunderstanding what Closed Source really is this whole time?

      It’s a codex holding back “eldritch cognitohazard” horrors that the technopriests of Microsoft have captured and tamed into an operating system. Releasing the source would release the beasts into our reality, much like the plot of John Carpenters In the Mouth of Madness.

      Well, figured out one good reason for closed source, I guess. Let’s not solve this LeMarchand’s Box.

  • gaael@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    9 days ago

    Is this real? It’s funny af, even if it’s not real, but does anyone know if it is?

  • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    9 days ago

    Then you have to go into a resource file and find a very specific resource ID for your control panel string, and create a new resource ID to me it to.

    Ah yes the joys of working with Microsoft Foundation Classes (MFC), Back in the day I supported a VS6.0 application, you have room for 65535 UI elements in an application (Including DLL’s) I had to split the ID’s up in ranges to enable adding new elements in a sane way.