Summary

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, Kamala Harris’ 2024 running mate, has suggested he may run for president in 2028.

Reflecting on the Democrats’ loss to Donald Trump and JD Vance, he admitted: “A large number of people did not believe we were fighting for them in the last election – and that’s the big disconnect.”

Walz said his life experience, rather than ambition, would guide his decision.

Though his VP campaign was marred by gaffes, he remains open to running if he feels prepared.

    • kata1yst@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      The things Walz has accomplished in his time in Minnesota is actually remarkable, especially given Minnesota’s traditionally libertarian/purple local politics.

      Literally the only attack Republicans in Minnesota have is his handling of the George Floyd protests and his COVID response, and those are weak and they know it.

      Under him we here in Minnesota got dozens of extremely progressive policies put though, our social programs have dramatically expanded and are extremely well funded, corruption has been rooted out, and our economy is booming. The Minnesota DFL under his leadership have gained a ton of ground as well, where nationally the DNC has given up a ton.

      No, he isn’t a great orator or debater. But as a politician and policy maker he’s a rare combination of progressive, well respected, and effective.

      • bradd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Tulsi Gabbard would have won vs Trump in 2024, had the DNC let her run, I guarantee it. Just one example.

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          If the Democrats had only chosen to nominate Donald Trump, they would’ve won too.

          • bradd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            This kind of thinking is exactly why you have Trump. You can’t except a moderate, so you get an extremist, sometimes it’s not your extremist.

            • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Tulsi is complete shit who nobody likes outside of her little fanclub/cult. She would not have won and even if she had she’s barely any better than Trump, and possibly worse. She’s an opportunistic right-wing shill who says whatever’s politically advantageous to advance her own career.

              • bradd@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Your opinions are wrong and I’ll prove it to you: Trump is president.

                • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  Yeah, because the Dems ran a “moderate” like you wanted. You just didn’t get your particular shitty opportunist cult leader.

                  Trump being president in no way proves either of the points of

                  • Tulsi not being dogshit and just as bad as Trump

                  • Tulsi actually being able to win

                  Typical Tulcel deflecting all criticism back to “Dems bad” no matter what the criticism is or where it’s coming from.