• DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Today: “…they will be deleted after Alexa processes your requests.”

    Some point in the not-so-distant future: “We are reaching out to let you know that your voice recordings will no longer be deleted. As we continue to expand Alexa’s capabilities, we have decided to no longer support this feature.”

    • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      And finally “We are reaching out to let you know Alexa key phrase based activation will no longer be supported. For better personalization, Alexa will always process audio in background. Don’t worry, your audio is safe with us, we highly care about your privacy.”

    • Eheran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      They could also transcribe the recording and only save that. I mean they absolutely will and surely already did do that.

    • Dave@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Or simply “…they will be deleted after Alexa processes your request and generates a token for AI training”.

  • guldukat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Always listening AI. I always thought the future would be awesome but capitalism has figured out a way for it to not be that.

  • fubarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    So… if you own an inexpensive Alexa device, it just doesn’t have the horsepower to process your requests on-device. Your basic $35 device is just a microphone and a wifi streamer (ok, it also handles buttons and fun LED light effects). The Alexa device SDK can run on a $5 ESP-32. That’s how little it needs to work on-site.

    Everything you say is getting sent to the cloud where it is NLP processed, parsed, then turned into command intents and matched against the devices and services you’ve installed. It does a match against the phrase ‘slots’ and returns results which are then turned into voice and played back on the speaker.

    With the new LLM-based Alexa+ services, it’s all on the cloud. Very little of the processing can happen on-device. If you want to use the service, don’t be surprised the voice commands end up on the cloud. In most cases, it already was.

    If you don’t like it, look into Home Assistant. But last I checked, to keep everything local and not too laggy, you’ll need a super beefy (expensive) local home server. Otherwise, it’s shipping your audio bits out to the cloud as well. There’s no free lunch.

    • Terrasque@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Also, the home assistant voice solution is still very much in it’s starting stage, and way behind where Alexa and similar commercial solutions are

  • Lydia_K@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    In the age of techno-fascism, the people willingly pay to install the listening devices into their own homes.

    • Terrasque@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      If you think that’s wild, just wait until you discover how much they pay for having one they can carry around with them!

  • yucandu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Wow there are way fewer “so what it’s the same as your smartphone” and “everyone does it, google, apple, it’s no big deal” comments on Lemmy.

  • Lenny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t think Google home listens in.

    Because I’d absolutely be disappeared by now if it did.

  • Doctor_Satan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    If you traveled back in time and told J. Edgar Hoover that in the future, the American public voluntarily wire-tapped themselves, he would cream his frilly pink panties.

  • jcs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    If anyone remembers the Mycroft Mark II Voice Assistant Kickstarter and was disappointed when development challenges and patent trolls caused the company’s untimely demise, know that hope is not lost for a FOSS/OSHW voice assistant insulated from Big Tech…

    FAQ: OVOS, Neon, and the Future of the Mycroft Voice Assistant

    Disclaimer: I do not represent any of these organizations in any way; I just believe in their mission and wish them all the success in getting there by spreading the word.

  • PeterisBacon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I have always told people to avoid Amazon.

    They have doorbells to watch who comes to your house and when.

    Indoor and outdoor security cameras to monitor when you go outside, for how long, and why.

    They acquired roomba, which not only maps out your house, but they have little cameras in them as well, another angle to monitor you through your house in more personal areas that indoor cameras might not see.

    They have the Alexa products meant to record you at all times for their own use and intent.

    Why do you think along with Amazon Prime subscriptions you get free cloud storage, free video streaming, free music? They are categorizing you in the most efficient and accurate way possible.

    Boycott anything Amazon touches

      • PeterisBacon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        That is actually good news to hear. Not completely good on my part for being incorrect about ownership, but once I saw the proposed deal back when it was announced, I immediately added them to the “no I don’t think I will.” list of products I won’t support.

        Cheers for the clarification mate

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Everything you say to your Echo…

    I don’t have an Echo.

  • MurrayL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 days ago

    If you do not want to set your voice recordings setting to ‘Don’t save recordings,’ please follow these steps before March 28th:

    Am I the only one curious to know what these steps are? The image cuts off the rest of the email.

    • pogmommy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago
      1. Unplug your amazon echo devices
      1. Hit it with a hammer
      1. Send it to an electronics recycler
    • MurrayL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      If anyone else is wondering, I’ve not found a verbatim quote of the steps but I did see an article that mentioned the consequences. It seems like you will be able to turn this off but it will disable Voice ID:

      anyone with their Echo device set to “Don’t save recordings” will see their already-purchased devices’ Voice ID feature bricked. Voice ID enables Alexa to do things like share user-specified calendar events, reminders, music, and more. Previously, Amazon has said that “if you choose not to save any voice recordings, Voice ID may not work.” As of March 28, broken Voice ID is a guarantee for people who don’t let Amazon store their voice recordings.

      • IMALlama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        The old “privacy focused” setting made speech processing local. The new “privacy focused setting” means that processing will happen on a remote server, but Amazon won’t store the audio after it’s been processed. Amazon could still fingerprint voices with the new setting, to know if it was you or your parents/parter/kid/roommate/whomever and give a person specific response, but for now at least they appear to not be doing so.

        This all seems like it’s missing the point to me. If you own one of these devices you’re giving up privacy for convenience. With the old privacy setting you were still sending your processed speech to a server nearly every time you interacted with one of those devices because they can’t always react/provide a response on their own. Other than trying to avoid voice fingerprinting, it doesn’t seem like the old setting would gain you much privacy. They still know the device associated to the interaction, know where the device is located, which accounts it’s associated with, what the interaction was, etc. They can then fuse this information with tons of other data collected from different devices, like a phone or computer. They don’t need your unprocessed speech to know way too much about you.