HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · edit-26 天前Why make it complicated?lemmy.mlimagemessage-square120fedilinkarrow-up1356arrow-down136file-textcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1320arrow-down1imageWhy make it complicated?lemmy.mlHiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · edit-26 天前message-square120fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squaremasterspace@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up34arrow-down1·6 天前Yeah, it’s explicitly distinct from const a: String which says it won’t change, and var a: String, which means this is legacy code that needs fixing.
minus-squarePsaldorn@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·6 天前If there’s only two options you only need one keyword
minus-squareHotzilla@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-26 天前True, but var and let are not same in js, so there is three. if(true) { var a = "dumdum" } console.log(a) Is valid and functioning javascript. With let it is not.
minus-squareLemminary@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 天前Ah, but this is JS, so there are three options! And they all function entirely differently. And your assumptions don’t apply, either. :D
Yeah, it’s explicitly distinct from
const a: Stringwhich says it won’t change, andvar a: String, which means this is legacy code that needs fixing.If there’s only two options you only need one keyword
True, but var and let are not same in js, so there is three.
if(true) {var a = "dumdum"}console.log(a)Is valid and functioning javascript. With let it is not.
Ah, but this is JS, so there are three options! And they all function entirely differently. And your assumptions don’t apply, either. :D