Good discussion of two types of social movements: Inclusionary (building a wide coalition by appealing to many different groups) vs exclusionary (building group solidarity through us v them strategies). The challenges to both, and the ways the elite try to capture and appropriate inclusionary social movements to maintain the status quo.
Why is this “solarpunk”? Because solarpunk is a social movement, not just an aesthetic. If you want to make positive change (environmental or otherwise) you need collective action, and understanding the challenges to collective action helps you decide what orgs are worth committing to and see when those orgs have been appropriated.
The other articles in the series are “Widening the We” and “The Growth of Malignant and Exclusionary Social Movements” - linked at the bottom and also worth reading.
That was incredibly dense but a very good read, the idea of the holding environment and “third force” were both really interesting and gave me a lot to think about
I also really liked this part from the conclusion
Thank you very much for posting
Thank you for reading it!
I used to never be the kind of person to click through to the article but since switching to Lemmy I’ve been trying to get better about actually reading the article, and I figure it helps to share my takeaways or excerpts I think folks who don’t read it would appreciate for context or whatever
I’m really happy to be the kinda person who reads the articles sometimes now ☺️. Hope you have a lovely day!