First off that’s a strawman It’s not just one guy.
If you discuss with an idiot, he can drag into his idiocy; there’s no need to defend Ross Scott, the issue is completely different level.
His (the person you reply to) whole argument is more on the line “they lose, so it mean they must be wrong” (or doing something wrong.
Picture the global politics today: human rights are failing all over and someone say “human rights advocate are losers, and I am cool by saying this”.
There’s dissonance between what people think they say, and what they actually say. @ImplyingImplications thinks he’s cool because denounce the losers while in fact he’s just saying “I don’t deserve these rights” <- he’s the only true loser because his enemies didn’t need to start the fight from the beginning (at the last with himself).
If you discuss with an idiot, he can drag into his idiocy; there’s no need to defend Ross Scott, the issue is completely different level.
His (the person you reply to) whole argument is more on the line “they lose, so it mean they must be wrong” (or doing something wrong.
Picture the global politics today: human rights are failing all over and someone say “human rights advocate are losers, and I am cool by saying this”.
There’s dissonance between what people think they say, and what they actually say. @ImplyingImplications thinks he’s cool because denounce the losers while in fact he’s just saying “I don’t deserve these rights” <- he’s the only true loser because his enemies didn’t need to start the fight from the beginning (at the last with himself).