• DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Nah dawg.

    We’re all going to work until we’re so old that when we retire we don’t get to enjoy what’s left of our lives. Instead we’ll get to experience non-stop health problems, hospital visits, surgeries, daily pill schedules you can’t skip or you die, and general exhaustion.

    Literally happening to both my parents exactly like this.

    And that’s if you even make it to retirement, which I’ve personally witnessed a few people not do.

    It’s a scam y’all. Dipshits floating around on yachts while we die working. Wanna fix it all? Gotta get together, hold hands, and have a general strike until our demands are met. Totally possible, but not going to happen.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I don’t expect to retire.

      I’ll probably be found at my desk on a Monday, not even first thing, but like, at 11:45, after dying there sometime Friday afternoon, and people just thought I was “working late” and left for the weekend, while I’m a literal corpse.

      Whatever. I’m over it. I won’t have any fucks left to give when that happens because I won’t be alive to give any fucks.

    • EldenLord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Gotta get together

      This is it. This is literally the secret behind which Utopia is sealed. There are so, so many decent, empathetic humans that we could easily banish the narcissist, malevolent dipshits that make earth hell from our society.

      Problem: even “good” humans have their flaws baked into their genes and brains, we are far too easily swept up into a a “us vs. them” dynamic. The only way of fixing this is to manually control your emotional behaviour and correct yourself constantly. Don‘t exhaust yourself with that, but try to remember what you really value before becoming a puppet for people with bad interests.

    • CalipherJones@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I worry that even if everything was right in my life it still wouldn’t be enough. Passion has become so rare.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      4 day work weeks or 52 vacation days per year as a minimum. You can either take one day a week and only work 4 days each week, or save them up and take a 10 week vacation.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      One thing I miss about working at Amazon was not only the 4 day work weeks, but the fact that they handed out PTO so generously that you could literally call off one day every single week (or sleep in and come in late every single day, which is what I did), and it was absolutely fine.

      But unfortunately I had to leave cause I got tired of the thermostat being set to 83°F, and the management who wouldn’t lift a finger for anybody. Still, not the worst place in the world to work. You can just put on your headphones, load up a playlist of podcasts, and zone out for your entire shift. Not having to go through an interview process is nice too. Just show up, take a picture, spit on a sponge (they don’t drug test for weed), and you’re hired.

  • darcranium123@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Universal basic income could help us achieve this. There are people working right now to make this a reality in America

    • Landless2029@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      19 hours ago

      There was a time back when this was possible.

      Bikers back in the day would work construction or some other hard labor for half the year and then hit the road for 2-4 months.

      The partial working income was enough to cover all thier bills, the bike/gear, motel stays and drinking.

      • LousyCornMuffins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        the retirement goal is to be a year round camp host for the park system. I’d say national park, but my favorite is a state park and i don’t expect the US national park system to exist in, uh, carry the two, 2065 when I am finally allowed to either die or retire.

      • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        People still do this. I have a buddy who only works 3-4 months a year. Hes a pipeline welder so long hours and hard work, but then he travels around the rest of the time

        • underscores@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          It works for them because their work is high skill and always useful, general office work like mine (dev) is impossible to find a job if you were to immediately quit. It’s quite different when you’re competing against thousands of cheap IT graduates looking to flock to your country and work for pennies on the dollar.

          BTW not saying I’m anti immigration, it’s just the way the tech space is right now.

          Not American but I’ve heard American companies hire foreigners because they can wage slave them with Visa entrapment, no Visa and you’re deported. People that are trying to improve their life are just taken advantage of.

          I haven’t heard of anything like that happening to tradespeople

          • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            I think it’s more because pipeline work is inherently unstable so they get paid a lot but it’s for short contracts. Plus it means businesses are more used to transient workers.

            Like my buddy can clear $80k in 3 months working 100hr weeks. There’s no IT job in the world that would give you those kinds of hours.

            And yeah, American companies sometimes use the visa trap to get workers. But don’t pretend thats a uniquely American phenomenon haha

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I kind of do this. I high rig for concerts in the summer, then fuck off the rest of the year.

    • Jax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      In controlled environments, maybe — however those controlled environments still interact with currently established economies.

      I’m just not convinced that UBI scaled up will actually result in anything other than what takes place in the Expanse.

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        18 hours ago

        They stole our data to train AI. So, if in the future that robots displaced the vast majority of jobs, then tax the robots to fund UBI.

      • underline960@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I think it’s less the interaction with currently established economies and more that it would never pass without lobbyists Congressmen sabotaging the law to make it fail and then using that to say, “See!? UBI doesn’t work (when you set it up to fail)!”

        • Jax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          I mean, yes — but the reality is that universal basic income dictates that everyone gets the money.

          For instance, let’s say Congress allows the perfect UBI bill to be put forth. For whatever Bizarro World reason you can conjure, because we both agree that they would never agree.

          What happens next? We’ve already seen what regulatory capture has done to sectors like real estate. Corpos buy up shitloads of land, whether it’s individuals looking to be land barons or alongside corporate interests.

          How would true UBI result in anything other than higher prices? Seriously, in the current markets that exist within the United States — how, without some kind of serious societal and economic shift prior to it’s introduction, would this actually play out?

          Maybe it’s better in other democracies, I actually can’t really argue for any other nation — I can only apply this concept to what I already know. I just think UBI is a concept that can only exist in a place entirely separate from corporate greed, and that is definitely not the United States.

          • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            18 hours ago

            So you’re saying that UBI would lead to higher costs of living, because companies can charge more because people can spend more.

            Then, explain to me, how did it come that in the 1960s, Americans were wealthy? How could they afford so much stuff back then? Corporate greed already existed back then; why didn’t it just eat up the wealth of the citizens?

            • Jax@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              16 hours ago

              Oh, don’t get me wrong — my position has never been that UBI can’t work under the right conditions.

              My position is that UBI cannot work without very major changes first. I don’t doubt that UBI can inject a lot of good into an individual’s standard of living — without some kind of regulation associated with it, which requires those regulatory agencies to not be inherently corrupt, UBI seems impossible.

            • ඞmir@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Lack of safety regulations that allowed people to be slowly poisoned by cheap materials or die in freak accidents, siphoning resources from the rest of the world through soft and hard political power, and not being destroyed from WW2 while Europe was recovering

              • LousyCornMuffins@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 hours ago

                not being destroyed from WW2 while Europe was recovering

                i would argue that it was largely this, plus the states added a ridiculous amount of industrial capacity in WW2. i like to use california as my example. it was a small western state before the war. then they needed 3-5 million more people on the west coast to build warships (and support the people building warships) so california’s population nearly doubled in 20 years (per the US Census 1930: 5,677,251 people; 1940: 6,907,387 people; 1950: 10,586,223 people). I recognize my view is a touch biased because i knew a lot of people at the old submarine shipyard.

                a huge victory for keynesian economics. it’s my go to example whenever monetarists start talking like they’re the only school that matters (don’t get me started they both work and have their benefits and drawbacks i was in micro and just like winding up the macro dudes).

  • atlien51@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Corporate: not a chance in hell. You’re lucky you get annual leave at all, if it wasn’t mandated by law you’d never get that either.

    • blarghly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Hot take: tons of office jobs are super reasonable. Small to mid sized companies that don’t do anything particularly exciting, where you can find a position where you play an important role in the company but someone else can take on the work you normally do when needed, or the work you do only needs to be done at certain times of the year. You can talk directly to the owner, or managers have leeway to handle employees schedules without a ton of oversight.

      Talk to whoever you need to. Explain how time off is more important to you than pay, and how the company will still do well when you take extended time off. It goes 1 of 3 ways. They agree immediately - win. They want proof that your idea will work - so prove it will work, then win. Or they outright refuse or fire you, in which case you find somewhere else to work and try again until you win.

      • atlien51@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Yeah idk what jobs you’re talking about…every time I see posts from people complaining (rightfully) about the office environment it’s from big companies.

        Small to mid: small company , small salary. And like…tiny progression opportunities lol. I genuinely don’t see how these would be better at all than corpos, bc a lot of small companies try to cram multiple jobs into one too bc they usually can’t afford to hire as many people as they’d like. Rare companies like what you described do exist though, just…v rare

    • Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I’m not really a Marxist but I do believe in “Workers of the world, unite!” and that includes Yankees. Laughing at your misfortune because I’m getting fucked with slightly more lube would be kinda short sighted.

    • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Eh. In practice, we’re fairly abused as well. I may have more holidays than my US counterparts, but in reality I can only take vacation when the schedule of the company allows it, which is never more than a week at a time at best and like three days in a row realistically.

      • Lazycog@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        61
        ·
        1 day ago

        Depends on a country of course yeah, my home country has a law that forces us to use continuous, uninterrupted, 3 week vacation in a year.

          • blargh513@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            20 hours ago

            YEAH THAT SOUNDS FUCKING HORRIBLE, TORTURE REALLY.

            I however am the rare american who is enjoying my third uninterrupted week of total freedom. This is because I was fired from my job three weeks ago. Corporate restructuring my ass.

            The time is nice and I did get some severance, but there is zero enjoyment knowing that if I don’t land a job soon, I will be hard fucked. Sorry kids, we are canceling music lessons, and any other recreations until your loser unemployed parent can get work again. Wheee!

            • vodka@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              20 hours ago

              I hate it because I’m forced to take it, even if I’d want to take 2+2+1 week instead.

              Many times if be much better off being able to not take three consecutive weeks off and use that time at other parts of the year. The 3 weeks also HAVE to be taken in June, July, or May. I hate summer and prefer staying indoors and working in AC.

              Let me take those 3 consecutive weeks at any time of the year and it’d be great. I’d love to go snowboarding for 3 weeks.

              BUT I am glad the law exists at all, forcing employers to give people proper vacations.

      • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        That seems to be highly dependent on location…we also have to coordinate with the needs of the company where i live, however we are still entitled to minimum 3 weeks vacation during summer (june-august) and at least two of them back to back regardless of the needs of the company.

        • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          If I were to put in two weeks back to back, there’s nothing they could legally do to stop me, true. But since we don’t even have a union at my job, retaliation is guaranteed. Considering it took me the better part of five years to get the job in the first place, the result is that you unfortunately don’t bite the hand that feeds you.

          • Rozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            the result is that you unfortunately don’t bite the hand that feeds you.

            *the hand that steals 99.9% of the value you create and leaves you with a few crumbs.

          • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            Sounds like a crazy toxic workplace TBH, I have never worked somewhere where 3 weeks coherent summer vacation wasn’t the norm in the entire company, with the remaining 3 weeks at your disposal for the rest of the year. We’re generally not unionised in my profession where i live either, at least not in the private sector.

        • hinterlufer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Also very dependent on the type of work you’re doing. If a certain amount of people need to be on site and you need to coordinate that, things get more difficult.

      • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        In my country you get almost 1 month of vacation time with extra days depending on work (I work Saturdays too so I get extra 4 days because of it) of which it’s actually mandatory that you take 2 weeks in one go so you really unplug yourself from work. The rest is as you please.

  • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I retired 25 yrs ago and it’s still not enough time to do all the stuff…3 months a year won’t cut it 😁 Gaming alone takes a lot of time lol

  • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    I live in a Scandinavian country. 6 weeks off with pay is alright. Dont really need more at this point.

    • lambipapp@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Am Swede. I have a legal 25. Then my company gives me +5, and the Union has negotiated 9 more (ark) and then, this year, my boss gave me 5 more. So I know that I am far above the average in sweden, but I currently sit on 44 paid vacation days a year