(As a general concept of how a society should run, not intended as a US-specific question.)

I sometimes see people on the internet saying that giving people easy access to guns is too risky and there should be stricter gun control, while simultaneously wanting to abolish the police? I’m just confused on what people really want?

You cant both abolish the police and then also disarm the citizens, gotta pick one. So which is it, internet? Self-policing with guns? Or reform the police?

[Please state what country you’re in]

---

(Also its funny how the far-right of the US is both pro-gun and pro-police, I’m confused by that as well)

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    2·
    15 hours ago

    With frequent mass school shootings I would think the only defensible position would be to be for as much gun restrictions as possible, otherwise you’d have to defend a necessary condition to allowing mass shootings to continue.

    Absent that condition I think people should be allowed to do what they want without fucking up everybody else.