I realized my VLC was broke some point in the week after updating Arch. I spend time troubleshooting then find a forum post with replies from an Arch moderator saying they knew it would happen and it’s my fault for not wanting to read through pages of changelogs. Another mod post says they won’t announce that on the RSS feed either. I thought I was doing good by following the RSS but I guess that’s not enough.

I’ve been happily using Arch for 5 years but after reading those posts I’ve decided to look for a different distro. Does anyone have recommendations for the closest I can get to Arch but with a different attitude around updating?

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ah yes, the issue with modern Linux, the community.

    I feel the shift to the current “git gud” style of blaming the user in any support has done more damage to Linux then any part of the software.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Sure, but when I am looking for an answer toxic positivity and RTFM are often the same thing. The number of times people jump up to defend the manual and glaze the program without even checking if the info is in the manual (or if the manual even makes sense at all) is way too high.

        I used to have to work on new stuff all the time and would have to read whitepapers or engineering change docs on the daily, and no the tangled mess most Linux documentation is in does not count as a functioning source of information.

        The part that still grinds my gears is why bother to type out nothing of value like RTFM at all? Forums are filled with terrible posts belittleing the question instead of just answering the question. Its not helping anyone and at least to me makes little sense.

    • freewheel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I’m amazed at the idea that in any technical community, an urging to gain more skill in your chosen environment could somehow be seen as negative.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I would make a joke here about arch and gatekeeping but its not just an arch issue.

        • freewheel@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          It is most certainly not. (He says, as he comes fuming out of yet another meeting about a ticket that could have been solved at Tier 2 if support would learn how to read a log)

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Oh pebkac is alive and well, no doubt about it. But expecting any level of expertise from an non commercial end user while simultaneously shooting down their questions is not going to help.

            • freewheel@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              48 minutes ago

              I absolutely agree, but here’s the problem in this context:

              • OP isn’t non-commercial. By their own words, they’d been doing desktop support for MacOS - plastic-wrapped and glittery, but still a *nix. Five years in, one’s search-fu and tolerance for reading docs should be well developed.
              • Their question was answered by the page they found. OP’s argument is they didn’t like the tone used to reply to THAT post’s OP and concluded from that tone that their expertise wouldn’t be valued “in the way they would like”. There’s room to develop some grit here.
              • Arch isn’t intended for inexperienced users, and that is made clear in the docs. “It is targeted at the proficient GNU/Linux user, or anyone with a do-it-yourself attitude who is willing to read the documentation, and solve their own problems.” (https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Arch_Linux#User_centrality) Getting this upset over a single package readjustment, no matter how badly it was communicated, tells me OP doesn’t have a ton of experience with bare metal linux. There’s just no way to sugarcoat that.

              Arch gatekeeps on occasion, yes, but this isn’t that. This is the simple rules of that particular distro. OP is free to find something that better fits their needs; and it appears they have.

    • BullCrapDetekta33@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      omg you guys are fragile af

      I just had this exact same issue. I installed the package. Done.

      No whining. It’s one fucking line of code.

      They are not tech support. Maybe call applecare.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Why even type this?

        Do you feel better doing so?

        This is not a support forum, this is not tech support, this is lemmy and other then giving a great example of what the OP is getting at what does your comment address?

    • Flatfire@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t feel like this is a terribly recent attitude. It’s definitely one I’ve encountered repeatedly over a decade or more of dipping my toes in the pool. It’s not incorrect in a lot of circumstances, but it’s very difficult to find support when no one wants to help you improve. There’s always been a significant degree of ego in Linux user communities.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Not wanting to help would be better then this, its like they just want to “win” the support ticket. Its so terribly counterproductive.