• JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    There’s already a big flaw in this, and it won’t work with teenagers.

    If they want to access Reddit, they’ll just do something like grab a pic of their grandparent who never uses Reddit, sneak out their ID whilst they’re sleeping, and get verification without anyone getting notified.
    Sounds extreme but I can just imagine teens doing this without issue. It would be extremely easy.

  • Skavau@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Look at what Reddit is saying. It’s absurd:

    For UK users under 18, Reddit said it has to restrict sexually explicit content; content that promotes suicide, deliberate self-injury, and eating disorders; content that incites abuse or hatred against people based upon protected characteristics; bullying content; content that promotes violence or “depicts real or realistic serious violence against a person, an animal, or a fictional creature”; content that promotes challenges or stunts that are likely to cause serious injuries; content that encourages people to use harmful substances or substances in harmful quantities; content that shames people based on body type or physical features; and “content that promotes or romanticizes depression, hopelessness and despair.”

    WTF? How is this supposed to work? A system that auto-blocks all NSFW tagged content itself as a blunt instrument is viable - but half the stuff on here, on Reddit here isn’t even necessarily tagged as NSFW when its posted. Are extreme mountain biking or skiing or skateboarding or other similar types videos going to be age-gated because they could be content that “promotes challenges or stunts that are likely to cause serious injuries”? How do you verify whether or not content specifically romanticises “hopelessness” or “despair” exactly? Are Giles Corey songs now 18+? What does that even mean? Even the writing of it is Orwellian.

    It also adds “depicts real or realistic serious violence against a person, an animal, or a fictional creature” ???

    Are action movie clips now going to be age-gated? Or video game clips? From TV shows and films that are PG-13?

    • ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s simple:

      1. Tag everything nsfw to comply with uk rule
      2. don’t tag anything nsfw because Reddit needs ads
      3. breaking rule 1 or 2 results in a ban
  • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    21 hours ago

    “Persona promises not to retain the photo for longer than 7 days and will not have access to your Reddit data such as the subreddits you visit,”

    Why would they need to have it any longer than the few seconds it takes to verify the age?

    • tourist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      It’ll only be an issue if they host mature content or federate with other instances that do, no?

    • Derpgon@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Why would they have to handle it? This is Rddit’s choice, not the law. I mean, why would Redit decide it now? Does Feddit fall under the same act? Or is it something new?

      • Skavau@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Feddit is actually (presumably) hosted in the UK, so if Ofcom actually knew what the Fediverse is they could start trying to demand they do age verification.

        • flamingos-cant@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          15 hours ago

          We’re hosted in Germany, but that doesn’t actually matter as the admins are physically in the UK so Ofcom fines are actually a worry. I need to do another review (yay), but I’m pretty sure we don’t have to do any age verification. We do have to assume all our users are children though, as we can only say we don’t if we do ‘highly effective age verification’* of our users, and we do host content that is ‘likely to appeal to children’, but I don’t believe we host anything that would need to be gatekept from children. We actively block NSFW content and as far as I’m aware there isn’t a suicide encouragement or terrorist recruitment community on Lemmy. There are maybe some things that I may need to be changed/patch in Lemmy (e.g. letting users lock their own posts), or making some safety tools (one I want to work on is doing perceptual hashing of images embedded in markdown as current tools only work on post links), but I don’t think complying is necessary an issue for us. I’m not a lawyer though and that’s just my understanding, we could be fucked.

          * This entire ‘force every website to keep a separate database of users adult status’ is so stupid and I swear it only works like this because of lobbying from companies like Yoti. PornHub is right that it should be device based, but these laws are only using children as a crutch. It’s implemented like this because certain parts of the British establishment find porn icky and are hoping by making it more invasive to access that you’ll stop watching it. Of course, all this is going to do is push people to sites that don’t follow the law so host more extreme content.