Bottom bitch got his orders.

Why is Charlie Kirk protecting child rapists and why are they his friends?

    • Noite_Etion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 hours ago

      They probs are.

      Jeffrey Epstein was not the only dude with a list. Wouldn’t be surprised if Trump (and his mates) have their own lists to use as mutually assured destruction.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        38 minutes ago

        Wow, imagine if all this awful shit could lead to a Mutually Assured Destruction of documents and net worths rather than one of nuking the biosphere.

        That line of thought just turned the worst parts about the worst people into a pleasant thought for me this morning!

        🎼 Always look on the bright side of life🎶🎵

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Uh, have you seen The List? There are definitely Republicans who absolutely are pedophiles.

      I’ll see if I can find the copypasta.

  • neuromorph@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    17 hours ago

    The issue isnt that Trunp is on the lost. We have photos.

    The issue is all the other nameless faceless republican Mega donors that are on the list and the liability disclosure has on them, if their victims can now name them.

  • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Charlie Kirk and Steve Bannon are pitching a special prosecutor to look into the Epstein stuff… who do they support to do it? Matt Gaetz. You know, the guy who also traffics underage women for sex. Why would you want something like that one would ask? Child rapists investigating child rapists? Simple… If Gaetz doesn’t manipulate the investigation in a manner that goes the way Trump wants it too, the DOJ can charge and convict him of trafficking and having sex with an underage girl for money, because they never formally charged him previously… It’s not much of a reach to say it was just blackmail they were putting aside to ensure his full cooperation after swearing him in Attorney General. (Thankfully he wasn’t)

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      32 minutes ago

      The defense I’ve seen start to pop up on 4chan’s /pol/ board, which has had a fairly big impact on politics/conspiracy theories, is that the girls were “only” 14 and might have had sex before (some of the victims who’ve spoken publicly described having experienced sexual abuse before.) Some of the girls “participated” in trafficking others, being paid to bring friends with them.

      There are several in the alt right and conservative spaces who do think it is ideal for men to marry teenage girls. Many parts of the states where child marriage is legal (with minors also unable to file for divorce).

      With the attack on women’s rights - the same types literally want to abolish the 19th amendment, several conservatives have proposed the idea of “family votes,” at least five women are dead because of the end of Roe with more likely but states are actively refusing to investigate/are covering up these deaths, the attacks on “no fault” divorce, the alt right hysteria/obsession with birth rates…

      We have concentration camps now, for people who are in the country legally. All bets are off. I’m wondering if it’ll be more than just the 4chan degenerates suggesting that raping teenage girls is an acceptable thing to do.

  • Kurious84@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I don’t know this guy. I’m not sure which side he’s in favor of.

    The only thing I get is his face has a tucker Carlson type of punchable arrogant face.